Anyway ... back to the OP's post about Tommie Robinson.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-44287640
Note ...
A ban on reporting his 13-month sentence at the same court was lifted after being challenged by the media.
Robinson, from Bedfordshire, pleaded guilty to a charge of contempt of court.
A judge told him his actions could cause the ongoing trial to be re-run, costing "hundreds and hundreds of thousands of pounds".
And ...
Dominic Casciani - BBC home affairs correspondent writes ...
Why couldn't we initially report Robinson's arrest and jailing? Reporting restrictions are a long-standing part of the British legal system. In this case, the judge ordered a temporary media black-out because he feared reporting Robinson's conviction could influence the jury in the very case Robinson was targeting.
As I said on page 1 of this thread ...
"As for the case he is protesting about - there is a very real danger that (if he "skews" the case by highlighting details or inciting a view that defendants are already guilty) there is a very real chance that the defence will cry "foul" and there will be a mistrial and they might get off scot-free."