Wouldn't it be the noblest of all ambitions to strive to DO SOMETHING to attain salvation if it included "good works" and righteous standards?
What is noble about doing good orks with ulterior selfish motives?
I don't get why it is inferior to have such intentions. If I give money to charity and that benefits people in need is my good deed tainted because I get a Tax Deduction? The Tax Deduction may be the only reason I am ABLE to give to charity in the first place.
Could you explain it to me?
Sure, from MY understanding on this, if salvation is based on what we do and not WHY we do it, then WHY we do it is irelevant and salvation becomes a "game of numbers": Who gave the most, who collected the most "good points" or to hit closer to home: Who did the most service hours.
The parable of the pharisee that was well off and gave more and did more "good works" than the poor woman that give less BUT gave all she had not because she HAD to but because she did it out of love.
Humans tend to be very giving and loving and asking for nothing in return under circumstances of great distress and chaos, natural disaters are a prime example. When compassion ( suffering with others) drives Us we truly do give with no notion of what we can get back.
That is, however, the excpetion and not the rule.
God grace is best summed up like this:
There is nothing that Man can do to "get up there" with God, his intentions are tained because he is doing it TO "get up there" with God, so God comes down to Us in the form of His Only begotten son and shares our joys and sorrows with US (compassion).