http://www.ted.com/talks/ray_kurzweil_get_ready_for_hybrid_thinking
According to this Ted talk, you need Cantonese, Hindi, and...I forgot the third. You will have to watch the video.
how educated are you?
and how great is your vocabularly ect ....?.
do you think ir right to judge people by how intelligent/ educated they are and how much vocabulary they use???.
http://www.ted.com/talks/ray_kurzweil_get_ready_for_hybrid_thinking
According to this Ted talk, you need Cantonese, Hindi, and...I forgot the third. You will have to watch the video.
how educated are you?
and how great is your vocabularly ect ....?.
do you think ir right to judge people by how intelligent/ educated they are and how much vocabulary they use???.
I have no degrees but a very large vocabulary. This I obtained from reading.
This board is one of the few places I indulge the full breadth of my language skills, which is very satisfying. I learned early to temper my language to my audience, or risk intimidating or annoying my listeners. It is awkward to stop and explain a word or a colloquialism. It breaks the flow.
People judge me all the time based on my language skills. I can't help but come across as intelligent. You know, because I .... am. This doesn't always help me. I am also ready to admit an error, which can either disarm my audience, or intimidate them further. You see, I am not afraid to expose my weaknesses. Fearless people are intimidating to the fearful.
Here's another thought, though I have not found the source. One survival technique is to have as many options as possible. Reduce your options, and you are limited in the directions you can go. Imagine a narrow path with only one exit. Get caught in there with a saber-toothed tiger, and you are toast. Education and knowledge open up greater options, and are therefore very useful to have.
fusion with god natural .
in the cosmos universe or whatever.
all things are made of the same materials etc so humans will always be fused with the universe in life and death because those building blocks are eternal.
Well, if one starts with the premise that all "worldly" is suspect (as my daughter does), and the corollory that spiritual is superior, people with this worldview weigh the scale sadly in disfavour of conventional science.
The weakest of arguments against conventional science looks like a "slam-dunk" to them.
if we have faith in science and scientific claims about the universe, origins of life etc.
is that absolute truth.
if so then if they declare that god exists with evidence then do all those who believe in science then believe in god or a creator.
Opinion is irrelevant if you haven't thought through the implications. Otherwise I might as well be having a conversation with a parrot. Have you noticed that you breeze right by the insightful posts and respond to the perceived insult?
if we have faith in science and scientific claims about the universe, origins of life etc.
is that absolute truth.
if so then if they declare that god exists with evidence then do all those who believe in science then believe in god or a creator.
Unfounded claptrap is not intelligent or helpful. It does not lead to dialogue or mutual understanding. Bouncing claptrap is simply annoying.
fusion with god natural .
in the cosmos universe or whatever.
all things are made of the same materials etc so humans will always be fused with the universe in life and death because those building blocks are eternal.
seekchristwhatever, there's been a lot of progress in science since you took it in high school. Things you assume are unknown are figured out, which has led to ever more elegant questions, with ever more interesting answers.
it's claimed it takes 400 million atoms to become a single strand of dna.
how do the atoms know.
3. what order.
Really, genuine inquiry? Then why don't you answer any of my questions? I have not detected any depth yet.
it's claimed it takes 400 million atoms to become a single strand of dna.
how do the atoms know.
3. what order.
....then each one knows, amazingly, what to do next.
is atheism a belief system.
after all the atheist believes there is no god .so if that's the case then an atheist if a person of faith.
they have faith in the fact there is no god.
Something from nothing: strawman argument!
if we have faith in science and scientific claims about the universe, origins of life etc.
is that absolute truth.
if so then if they declare that god exists with evidence then do all those who believe in science then believe in god or a creator.
What is the difference between truth and Absolute Truth?