I took up Tibor's challenge to email him last year. Here is how the convo went which I could also supply screenshots of. He totally ghosted me when I asked him for answers on ethical issues which he claimed he would answer. That told me all I needed to know about Tibor. He only popped up about the greenscreen debate and nothing else mattered to him. Not our feelings or Lloyd's behavior.
My message to tibor:
"Hey Tibor. I do believe it is you posting on the forum. However I wonder why you refuse to answer anything other than about the greenscreen issue? Do you have no problem with someone who claims to care about sex abuse survivors yet pays exploited women for sex?"
Tibor's response:
"Hi Jonathan!
My response to Tibor:
"Thanks for attempting to answer my question [SIC]. You say that Lloyd understands its bad. But does he? He refuses to apologize for it. He says that it doesn't matter if he uses funds from Patreon and it's no one's business. If you believe prostitution is bad as you claim why do you publicly stand by someone who doesn't find it bad? You say there is no proof he used funds. Yet he publicly stated it was no one's business if he did. What is the point of saying this if he didn't use funds? He has since changed his claims over what funds were used when the public was upset. So if you had evidence that say Patreon funds were used, would you even change your opinion?
I guess what I'm trying to get at is, why do you feel it ok for Lloy [SIC] to imply that none of this is a problem? Why do you feel it is ok for Lloyd to call people who do have a problem with it terrible people or still stuck in an "ex JW mindset"?
Why do you find it ok for Lloyd to name-call anyone who criticizes him yet you take a stand against those who name-call him/you?
Can you see how that immediately can rub people the wrong way. Do you feel that Lloyd has no culpability any of this?"