I took up Tibor's challenge to email him last year. Here is how the convo went which I could also supply screenshots of. He totally ghosted me when I asked him for answers on ethical issues which he claimed he would answer. That told me all I needed to know about Tibor. He only popped up about the greenscreen debate and nothing else mattered to him. Not our feelings or Lloyd's behavior.
My message to tibor:
"Hey Tibor. I do believe it is you posting on the forum. However I wonder why you refuse to answer anything other than about the greenscreen issue? Do you have no problem with someone who claims to care about sex abuse survivors yet pays exploited women for sex?"
Tibor's response:
"Hi Jonathan!
First of all, thanks for contacting me directly. You are the first and only one to do so.
I just wanted to clear up something I have direct impact on. The technical side of our video production is my job and I simply wanted to debunk a very simple and IMO silly theory about us using a green screen.
As to my refusal to answer questions, I just don't see the point. Do you or anyone else need me to tell you that prostitution is bad? Or that adultery is bad? All of us, including Lloyd are aware of this and that's why I don't see the point in answering those questions.
As for other questions like misusing funds or using sex workers in Thailand, I am not answering those because I have no proof of either. I don't have access to company finances or Lloyd's personal accounts so how could I prove or disprove any of it? Same for prostitution in Thailand, I have no idea what Lloyd was or wasn't doing there so how am I in position to talk about it?
Also, the way people on the forum replied to me puts me off answering any question that I would otherwise. Accusing me of being Lloyd is just sad, amd doing so for using the expression "new low" and saying I told him about the forum post, which I did. This proves these people cling to anything and as soon as they don't get what they want they start name-calling you. Really sad IMO.
Hope you see my point, if not I am open to more questions if you have them.
Take care,Tibor Cecelja"
My response to Tibor:
"Thanks for attempting to answer my question [SIC]. You say that Lloyd understands its bad. But does he? He refuses to apologize for it. He says that it doesn't matter if he uses funds from Patreon and it's no one's business. If you believe prostitution is bad as you claim why do you publicly stand by someone who doesn't find it bad? You say there is no proof he used funds. Yet he publicly stated it was no one's business if he did. What is the point of saying this if he didn't use funds? He has since changed his claims over what funds were used when the public was upset. So if you had evidence that say Patreon funds were used, would you even change your opinion?
I guess what I'm trying to get at is, why do you feel it ok for Lloy [SIC] to imply that none of this is a problem? Why do you feel it is ok for Lloyd to call people who do have a problem with it terrible people or still stuck in an "ex JW mindset"?
Why do you find it ok for Lloyd to name-call anyone who criticizes him yet you take a stand against those who name-call him/you?
Can you see how that immediately can rub people the wrong way. Do you feel that Lloyd has no culpability any of this?"