Well, the reasoning I can recall is, it's the same as in the first century--even though everyone back then was 'anointed', that didn't mean they all had a say in doctrinal matters; only the apostles and older men in Jerusalem had a say. They'd reference Acts 16:4, is it? The letter being sent out from the council in Jerusalem? They'd say, hence, the GB has the authority to 'represent' the 'slave' today. But if they are flat out saying that the faithful slave represents ONLY the Governing Body, they are basically saying that there are no more anointed except they themselves. This would eliminate the need to even mention other anointed, take the statistics of Memorial partakers off the Yearbook, and that's the end of that. They could conceivably do this and have it work. Interesting.
--sd-7