"But you will hear that when Mr. Kendrick was removed as a ministerial servant, that's a significant event, it doesn't happen every day, that's a signal that something is wrong."
And of course a JW is going to think this guy's a child molester and keep their kids away from him, right??? For all they would know, he could've just made 5 hours of field service a month, been looking at porn, or been unable to do too many talks due to his job. This lawyer is shovelin' some serious crap.
The other glaring question is, was this guy 'privately reproved'? One would think that an offense of this sort would warrant public reproof and maybe even a local needs talk about the need to protect your kids, like, right afterwards, so people would put two and two together on their own and keep their kids away from him. That, I would think, would be the farthest they could go and would cover their behinds legally, since they wouldn't be naming him directly, but they'd get the point across publicly that he was a threat. But even that would be too much to ask, wouldn't it? And that's the least they could've done. But I guess I shouldn't turn this into a running commentary on the transcript...
I'll keep reading...
--sd-7