Undercover
If the members of this ex-Jw message board met in person-hmmmmmmm !!!
Acolytes
many outsiders see good in the w.t.
and many insiders see good in the w.t.. so is not the w:t like any other organisation based on idealisam and growth.
acolytes.
Undercover
If the members of this ex-Jw message board met in person-hmmmmmmm !!!
Acolytes
But god killings Davids unborn son, for Davids adultry was in my mind less righteouse than mans judgement on Clinton (Ask Hillary)
Acolytes
many outsiders see good in the w.t.
and many insiders see good in the w.t.. so is not the w:t like any other organisation based on idealisam and growth.
acolytes.
tec, To many commission means the never never.
James Wood i have no knowledge of the unitarians. I had never thought of Buddisasim as an organisation (Maybe it is ?) Iam not a J.W apölogist.
J hoffer, my point exactly.
Undecover i meant organisations in general, i see religiouse organisations as organisation first,religion second.
james wood (again) great point.thanks
P.S The RCC sounds like the J.Ws were in the begginning.
Acolytes
many outsiders see good in the w.t.
and many insiders see good in the w.t.. so is not the w:t like any other organisation based on idealisam and growth.
acolytes.
designs and j hoffer, thanks fot the thoughts.
Tec, the J Ws is a corporate bussiness organisation its members are paid commission only.
Blondie.All religiouse organisations see themselfs as better than other religiouse organisations. (Thats why we dont have one religion, even T.V has many channels)
Acolytes.
many outsiders see good in the w.t.
and many insiders see good in the w.t.. so is not the w:t like any other organisation based on idealisam and growth.
acolytes.
life is short
All organisations want so much from the members. Many people are happy after 25 years service to be discarded with a gold watch. (As if the company takes the blame for the members failed marrige, due to his/ her working extra hours.)
Acolytes
many outsiders see good in the w.t.
and many insiders see good in the w.t.. so is not the w:t like any other organisation based on idealisam and growth.
acolytes.
many outsiders see good in the w.t.
and many insiders see good in the w.t.. so is not the w:t like any other organisation based on idealisam and growth.
acolytes.
Ding
A.It usurps christ role as the ark of salvation
answer .All organizations see themsels as "The ark of there course"
B. It usurps christ role as mediator.
answer. All organisations take away individuality.
C. Its exstremly lelalistic.
answer. All organisations are legalistic.
D. It causes people to refuse life saving blood transfusions for there children
answer.Within there power, all organisations try to control people.
E. It uses fear and guilt to control people.
answer. Through the power of the spoken & written word all organisations try to control people..
ect ect
So from your answer i think what makes the J:W organisation worse than any other organisation is peoples .
A .False reliance on an organisation claiming to answer for God.
B. I think the ability for unqualified people to control peoples lifes.
D. It misquotes scholers and twists the bible to come up with doctrines
answer. All organisations use the power of language, and interpret words to support there course.
E. It has made more false prophesies of the end than anyother organisation
answer. All organisations make statements (prophesies) of why they are to be trusted.
many outsiders see good in the w.t.
and many insiders see good in the w.t.. so is not the w:t like any other organisation based on idealisam and growth.
acolytes.
Fairpoint
Is it not a fairpoint to say all organisations want you to accept everything the organisation says?. (And given the power and control the organisation would use it?)
Acolytes
many outsiders see good in the w.t.
and many insiders see good in the w.t.. so is not the w:t like any other organisation based on idealisam and growth.
acolytes.
Questioning Everything.
My sentiments exactly, but then i thought (many organisations have a disfellowshipping practice) its only the" success" of the W.T organisation that has made it so exstreme.
Acolytes
?
Acolytes