My first comment is that the quoted article's author and where it was published are not identified, making it impossible to investigate its credibility.
My second comment is that the article relies on unamed sources. There appear to be four persons cited as sources, only one is identified (Lee Waters; the radio show host is named but is not a source of information). Furthermore the actual contents of Water's alleged SRA files are not disclosed, only an undocumented summary of what remains hidden (if it exists at all).
My third comment on this article is that unsupported speculation about Watchtower links to the Illuminati, Freemasonry and SRA are not productive. There is enough information about their actual doctrines, practices and history, documented by the Watchtower's own publications. It isn't necessary to say things that belong in a National Treasures sequel, nor is it appropriate. If we don't appreciate the Watchtower saying absurd things about Christendom and Worldly people, we should offer them the same respect.
My final comment: this is a rare time when I might agree with Alice!