Posts by EndofMysteries

I saw the original video months ago but forgot which video it was, but I read in another thread somebody claiming that video was removed. Is that true? I couldn't find a thread talking about this. I can only think if it was removed it may have been due to the recent royal commission.

112

Geoffrey Jackson's Golden Apple watch INVESTIGATED

by C0ntr013r in

i went through the original footage to get a good look at the watch.. from these pictures we can probably say that it is a apple watch and that it has a golden color.

the color on the pin is black, and the band is white, grey, silvery or beige.. .

the pin is in the exact place for it to be a apple watch.. only apple watch edition have the gold color.

EndofMysteries

Wow good catch!

1

Google Translate can put "speaking in tongues" to the test :)

by EndofMysteries in

since the real "speaking in tongues" were people speaking in other languages and needed somebody to translate (though many modern supposed ones think it's just making noises) now with google translate if somebody was truly speaking in tongues then it would identify the language and translate it.

EndofMysteries

haha I just tested it on myself. It actually doesn't let you speak in "detect language" but I picked french and don't know any french so just imitated it. I must have been speaking in tongues though because it translated what I said as, "is realizing 5 seconds none will know what time it is" lol.

1

Google Translate can put "speaking in tongues" to the test :)

by EndofMysteries in

since the real "speaking in tongues" were people speaking in other languages and needed somebody to translate (though many modern supposed ones think it's just making noises) now with google translate if somebody was truly speaking in tongues then it would identify the language and translate it.

EndofMysteries

Since the real "speaking in tongues" were people speaking in other languages and needed somebody to translate (though many modern supposed ones think it's just making noises) now with google translate if somebody was truly speaking in tongues then it would identify the language and translate it.

579

Won't get fooled again ...Moon Landing.

by The Rebel in

jw
friends

so i was fooled by the witnesses.

what can i learn from that?

not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.

EndofMysteries

I don't have time to read 50 pages of replies to see if anybody said what I'm about to say but here is my 2 cents.....

I did see one reply mention radiation and how humans couldn't survive. Recently, the past year, there were articles and news stories about some sort of force field (NOT the magnetic field), that circles Earth but goes out 8,000 miles which would supposedly protect from killer electrons. Since the moon is beyond this, could lead credibility to it not have happening. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/01/earth-invisible-force-field_n_6245942.html

Just because one can see man made objects on the moon doesn't mean man was on it. We have objects on mars now, but no men on mars.

I do wonder how they so quickly were able to put man on the moon so long ago yet a year or 2 ago I read USA wanted to do it again but it would take at least 11 years. If we had already done it, why would it take so long to do it again?

The moon conspiracy theory though doesn't really change anything though whether man was on it or not.

14

Bible teach book does not mentioned shunning

by poopie in

jw
friends

or disfelowshipping si the bible does not teach it.

EndofMysteries

It doesn't mention the most important doctrine and essential belief required for salvation either, that the GB is the faithful slave who must be obeyed to have God's favor. Nope it doesn't talk about that at all. Weird isn't it, that the most important thing for a JW to be saved isn't in the bible teach book!

15

Are beards allowed yet for MS and Elders??

by EndofMysteries in

i remember a little over 15 years ago, one of my first jobs at a grocery store, the manager was happy that they passed a new policy allowing them to grow a beard.

previously they were not allowed.

among the usa, i guess beards were considered not very professional still.

EndofMysteries

That is because people back then did not have access to razors and scissors to cut them often.
And no Data-Dog, beards are not cool. They prevent airflow around the face to cool it off.

Tell that to the ancient egyptians who had been shaving their face for centuries prior.