governing body of jehovah's witnesses meet to consider replacement for recently retired member geoffrey jackson.. .
.
Quite often when there's a picture of the Gobbering Body for their meeting Sanderson is the one with the "tech". Have you noticed that?
I'm guessing Sanderson was brought on board for his new tech ideas, either that or once he was on board, started advocating new tech as a way out of their overlapping stagnation, either way, I've got a feeling he had much to do with the re-branding of the WT to JW.0rg.
first off, i don't think that dude is going to show face.
he's most likely on a plane already.
if he shows it's bad pr and if he doesn't show it's bad pr.
IF the GB are mere figureheads as some have said, then perhaps indeed Jackson does not really know anything.
Maybe so Londo, but it would be excellent to see him on camera proving that is all he is, a figurehead front for the WT Corporation.
All the literature points to them as the source of all doctrine and direction, if that is so then let's hear him explain the reasoning behind using congregational guidelines for a culture that's 2000 years old.
If he doesn't know anything then the record will be there to show JW's what they're being taught is not founded on truth.
the two-finger-i'm-so-holy hand gesture is an old mannerism of catholic and orthodox hierarchs.
it's all over their catholic paintings and scultures, and greek orthodox icons of, jesus too.
................................... here then, the holy gesture is adapted for use even by our very own gb members who are trying to appear most holy themselves.. .
vincent tool said that he is exclusively working the phones for child abuse cases, but never said he is not the only one.
for now, let's assume the rate of abuse cases averages over time to the three or four cases he gets per month.
let's further assume that, since he isn't the only person working the phones and is on vacation at some point, the number is 4-5 per month, or 4.5 per month.
this is when all the pieces of the puzzle come together.
many thanks to simon for creating a forum which allows us to get a clear sense of what is happening.
without this forum i would still be wandering in the wilderness.
Hear, hear!
Simon deserves a good pint of beer
i actually started clapping at that point, as his honour explained to the wt type creep sycophantic slithery lawyer that........" i understand that we all have issues to face in life and .....that is a part of life...........however it has become obvious that this man ....is in such a position to assist with this investigation.....".
it boils down to the fact that stewart outright accused the latest witness of misleading the royal commission and this lead to some document searches which led his honour to conclude that they had been protecting mr jackson.
this was a warm and fluffy moment folks.................brilliant stuff!!!!!
One thing concerning the FDS doctrine is for sure, now that the teaching is changed to mean only the Gobbering Body is the FDS they can't share the blame with all the previously-known-as-FDS anointed members.
They wanted it all, no room for anyone else to be called FDS, well now they can have all the responsibility. This spiritual construct that is not an incorporated entity as the WT lawyers called them in the Unthank case. Maybe Jackson can explain that one.
wednesday 5 , day 7 live hearing.
case study 29, july 2015, sydney.
Spinks and O'Brien tried to shield Jackson from appearing before the RC and gave the lame excuse that he couldn't be of much help since he only deals with translation matters. Well Mr. Stewart exposed that lame lie!
So Mr. MacClelan has just asked for Jackson to appear next week! Yay!
wednesday 5 , day 7 live hearing.
case study 29, july 2015, sydney.
Angus looks angry about the shunning issue in which a victim of abuse leaves, disassociates from the religion and she's shunned by family and friends.
Wow! That's it, today Angus Stewart is my hero!
wednesday 5 , day 7 live hearing.
case study 29, july 2015, sydney.
The only reason the blonde is there is for distractionary purposes.....
and to make it look like the WT likes and uses women...
I seem to recall that the WT used a woman lawyer in the Unthank case.
And as Toole was asked, he has a woman lawyer in the law office business (a front).
Could she be either of these two?
In any case the "blonde" hasn't said a peep, hasn't asked any questions, just makes facial expressions and readjusts her hair or talks to the guys to her side, sitting there looking pretty and smug.
It would be interesting to know her involvement with the WT and exactly what role she plays before the RC.
wednesday 5 , day 7 live hearing.
case study 29, july 2015, sydney.
Amazing how disorganised this org appears when it's to their advantage.
Indeed. The whole organization structure is micromanaged to the umpteenth degree--the hierarchy is so anal about following direction and making reports just right and then they are asked questions before a judge and it's: "I don't recall," "I don't remember," "I'm not aware of that," "I am not involved in that specific aspect so I can't comment," "I can't give an answer to that hypothetical question," "You're asking me to respond to an absolute and I just can't do that," "I'm not involved with the legal dept.," "I'm not involved with the Service Dept.," "I'm not aware of the Branch Committee's manual"...
Of course not, WT drones only recall and remember when the WT lawyer asks a question!
