JW_Rogue

Joined

• started 83 topics
• posted 807 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by JW_Rogue

• 
  61

  The Watchtower Org will die.

  by Freeandclear in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i was just reading through some posts and had a startling realization.. the comment that sparked this went something like this: why oh why when i started into this in 1989 did i not research the history of the wtbts?

  etc....... i too was studying and moving towards baptism around that same time.

  i got dunked in dec of 1990.. my thought.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  JW_Rogue

  I don't think they are going anywhere for awhile, numbers may decrease but they will still be around. They may stop the printing presses but they will still be publishing to JW.org. Think about this they have survived false predictions about 1914, 1925, 1975, and the generation that will not pass away. Still the followers are there they are trapped.
• 
  75

  Witness Punk and Metal Band Names

  by Luther bertrand in

  1. social
  2. humour

  here is what i would name my band(s) let see if you can list some funny ones as well.

  here is my list:.

  local needs.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  JW_Rogue

  Wait...I have more:

  -Apocalypse...Soon

  -Split CLAMS

  -Propagated Propaganda (for a certain poster)
• 
  63

  Tight Pants

  by pixel in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  today is friday.

  so let's see something refreshing on the new june 2016 study wt.

  tight pants!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  JW_Rogue

  I don't get how they can complain about spanx.....they are undergarments that are worn to minimize flabby rolls of loose flesh. They looking up sister skirts these days?

  He said spanx but it became clear later that he was talking about spandex gym clothing or yoga pants on women. That's just too sexy instead they should wear baggy shorts and an oversized hoody if they want to work out. LOL While some of the stuff he talked about could be considered immodest, isn't that supposed to be up to the conscience of the individual? By naming specific fashions he is making up his own rules when these are supposed to just be principles. He even had the nerve to say "some of you might not like what I have to say but everything I say will be backed up by our publications". So he is saying that he is going to back up what he says by using something that he directly had a part in writing. Shouldn't he be backing up his ideas with scriptures? LOL And with the attention of millions of JWs tied into this broadcast he decides to give a downer of a talk just to let everyone know that they aren't spiritual enough, this guy is in charge?
• 
  41

  Caption This Photo From The January Study Edition

  by JW_Rogue in

  1. social
  2. humour

  so as some are probably aware the january study edition has two articles on the anointed.

  one basically discouraging people from believing they are anointed and another about how ones should view partakers.

  this photo is from the second article:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  JW_Rogue

  Caption: "Since I went to the memorial now I can skip the CLAM this week"
• 
  28

  This Website Was Mentioned By The Governing Body

  by JW_Rogue in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  okay, so at the "imitate their faith" ca there was a special speaker from the gb.

  and he started discussing psalms 1:1 and how we today could "sit in the seat of scoffers".

  he then mentioned that many bros. and sisters criticize the org and think they are so smart by researching online.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  JW_Rogue

  I' m a bit puzzled by the angle taken in the OP, so please help clarify and/or answer if you can.
  Contrary to the OP title, the unnamed GB member referred only to the internet and did not actually name this very website.
  And from what he said, you deduced he was referring to this website?

  If you'd like the name of the GB member you can PM me but I don't want to put it out there as it could give too much info about myself (I know it's a bit paranoid). Yeah, the title is a little misleading but still an interesting topic nonetheless. Plus his description really did make me think of this site, where else do people discuss, criticize, and research the JW organization all in one place? Plus he mentioned that many thought they were intellectual by doing so. Sounds like a lot of the posters here (which is good thing).
• 
  41

  Caption This Photo From The January Study Edition

  by JW_Rogue in

  1. social
  2. humour

  so as some are probably aware the january study edition has two articles on the anointed.

  one basically discouraging people from believing they are anointed and another about how ones should view partakers.

  this photo is from the second article:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  JW_Rogue

  Caption: "I wonder if I can get some of that wine when they're done"
• 
  41

  Caption This Photo From The January Study Edition

  by JW_Rogue in

  1. social
  2. humour

  so as some are probably aware the january study edition has two articles on the anointed.

  one basically discouraging people from believing they are anointed and another about how ones should view partakers.

  this photo is from the second article:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  JW_Rogue

  Every posed stance, facial expression etc is to 'teach' an idea - to infer something, to shape the mind and so often, it has a sharp ring of judgement about it. No doubt a question will be asked at the study concerning this photo - probably on the lines that one shouldn't judge who is or isn't a partaker

  Yes, that is what the real caption was about. It ridiculous that in one article they try to discourage people from partaking and in the next article they say "respect those who partake". Complete contradictions! However, his facial expression leaves it open to so many interpretations that it's actually pretty funny.
• 
  41

  Caption This Photo From The January Study Edition

  by JW_Rogue in

  1. social
  2. humour

  so as some are probably aware the january study edition has two articles on the anointed.

  one basically discouraging people from believing they are anointed and another about how ones should view partakers.

  this photo is from the second article:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  JW_Rogue

  Caption: "What restaurant are we going to go to after this boring talk?"
• 
  28

  This Website Was Mentioned By The Governing Body

  by JW_Rogue in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  okay, so at the "imitate their faith" ca there was a special speaker from the gb.

  and he started discussing psalms 1:1 and how we today could "sit in the seat of scoffers".

  he then mentioned that many bros. and sisters criticize the org and think they are so smart by researching online.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  JW_Rogue

  Okay, so at the "Imitate Their Faith" CA there was a special speaker from the GB. And he started discussing Psalms 1:1 and how we today could "sit in the seat of scoffers". He then mentioned that many Bros. and Sisters criticize the org and think they are so smart by researching online. Listening to ones who have no respect for God's arrangement on Earth. I just laughed a little cause I knew what website he was talking about.
• 
  41

  Caption This Photo From The January Study Edition

  by JW_Rogue in

  1. social
  2. humour

  so as some are probably aware the january study edition has two articles on the anointed.

  one basically discouraging people from believing they are anointed and another about how ones should view partakers.

  this photo is from the second article:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  JW_Rogue

  So as some are probably aware the January Study edition has two articles on the anointed. One basically discouraging people from believing they are anointed and another about how ones should view partakers. This photo is from the second article:

  
  

  Caption: "I didn't know Bob was a secret apostate who believes all Christians should partake as Jesus commanded."