now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.
now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.
our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.
What good would that do - Looter
Others would understand your main argument. Isn't that the whole point of saying anything?
Lots of people disagree with many things I write. That's fine with me. I am very confident about what I say and I want to be understood. Make your thoughts really clear and then be ready to consider counterarguments. That is how we learn.
now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.
now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.
our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.
Too little context makes you feel like you didn't say anything to the potential you could. - Looter
As a general rule the fewer words you can use to make your point the better. It's even worse if you use words inappropriately.
Let me show you a few examples of your overuse of words. I have underlined the words that make no sense in the context.
I often go back over things I have written and delete as many words as possible. Only use less common words if they convey the meaning of your sentence more clearly.
I still think you should try to rewrite your OP in 100 words or less.
now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.
now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.
our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.
It's hard to not use context without feeling empty - Looter
I said the exact opposite of that - "don't use more than you need to provide context."
now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.
now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.
our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.
I'm using an older computer. so it might not have newer features. - Looter
Just copy-paste the words you need - don't use more than you need to provide context. Then enter a new paragraph and type your reply. Highlight the quote and click on the quote button at the top of the dialogue box. It's third from the left and has a quote icon "".
now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.
now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.
our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.
looter - Would you like to know how to use the quote function so it is clear what bits you are saying?
i read the word "spiritual" sometimes on the site.
what exactly do the jw's mean by it ?.
I think people mean lots of different things by "spiritual".
I feel an intense sense of awe and wonder at the scale and complexity of life, the universe and everything. I don't believe anything supernatural is required to explain it. Is that spiritual?
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
guided evolution could at least partially explain the lack of transitional forms in the fossil record - Vander
#11 Tiktaalik
An amazing fossil discovery illustrates the transition of life from sea to land.
#14 Joey Goes to Oz
Fossil evidence for the origins of marsupials found in Antarctica exactly as predicted.
#16 Aquatic Mammals
An excellent sequence of fossils illustrates the evolutionary journey of whales from land to sea.
#18 Fish Fingers
The evolution of limbs is mapped out in an amazing sequence of ancient fish fossils.
#20 Lucy in the Sky...
An exceptional fossil of a 3 million year old hominid.
#23 Faunal Succession...
The consistent sequence of fossils found in the rocks can only be explained by evolution.
#24 The Origin of Your Inner Ear...
How the bones that reptiles eat with became the bones that we hear with.
There is an embarrassment of riches of transitional species. Try reading something written by a paleontologist in the past decade. You could start with Donald Prothero's "Evolution - What the Fossils Say and Why it Matters".
..specifically, the suffering of animals.
you can talk about free will/sin/people choosing to not listen to god etc to explain human suffering being allowed.. but how can you love a god that allows animals, that haven't sinned or chosen to not have anything to do with god, to have their short lives ended in often long, drawn out, painful ways.
i could list stories i've read that would probably make you feel ill, but i'm not looking to shock anyone or start an emotional debate.
Hello RestoredParadise1.
I looked at your website. You appear to be promoting a belief system that is 99.9999999999999999% Watchtower.
Very odd!
now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.
now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.
our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.
being rational is still a belief in itself
No it isn't. It is a commitment to be led by evidence.
There is always the case where "evidence" isn't totally believed or even explainable.
I am only talking about objective evidence that can be verified by anybody.
That doesn't mean it's irrational just because there is no refutable proof
Believing incredible things without evidence is the very definition of irrational.
If people just want to be honest and say that they believe because of blind faith then good luck to them. If they want to claim their belief is rational then let's hear the evidence.
now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.
now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.
our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.
Being rational means that our belief is commensurate with the evidence - "ratio".
If you tell me you own a pet dog I might believe you based on your word alone. If you tell me that an omnipotent deity made the world and raised Jesus from the dead I am going to ask you for a lot of objective evidence.
No such evidence exists and the evidence to the contrary is overwhelming.
Therefore theism is irrational.
I still have no idea what your OP is about. Why won't you tell me?
