your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
Kate - A few days ago you started a thread specifically designed to damage my reputation. I won't be sending any Facebook requests.
If you think you have evidence of something relevant you can describe it here. If it's an image and it won't upload it's probably too big, try reducing it.
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
Kate - Just post a link here or a description.
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
BTW thanks for proof reading for me and picking up on my grammar mistakes.
That's a free service.
Look at your messenger on Facebook I have sent you photographic evidence
Facebook must have lost it in cyberspace.
Photographic evidence of what exactly?
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
can I change my mind again
About what?
This was on Facebook
What was?
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
Clearly you're [sic] chemistry is correct and mine is incorrect... I am sorry about all the errors I have made you are right. - Kate
At last!
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
In racemic mixtures there is a tiny difference in size of “the competing populations” or the l- and d- enantiomers - Kate
Yes that is what I said.
and the molecules do not amplify exponentially.
If the reaction is AUTOcatalytic they amplify exponentially. Why are you avoiding this simple irrefutable fact? Oh wait a minute I think I might know why.
Only in meso compounds is there no tiny difference.
This has absolutely nothing to do with the price of fish as you well know.
Ask cantleave he will tell you your chemistry is wrong
I am sure he won't. No disrespect to Cantleave but I am more interested in things that Kenso Soai wrote in a peer reviewed paper.
I don’t need hard facts - Kate
On page 7 you admitted to being biased and "twisting facts".
I believe intellectual honesty and using facts carefully really matters. By your own admission you don't. Therefore this conversation is doomed to failure.
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
Kate I think you still don't get the significance of a point that I explained pages back.
1 - A catalytic reaction results in linear growth of the end product.
2 - An autocatalytic reaction results in exponential growth of the end product.
3 - Amino acids are autocatalytic.
4 - A tiny difference in the size of two competing populations of autocatalytic molecules will be amplified exponentially.
F.C. Frank postulated this as a solution to homochirality in 1974 and Kenso Soai first proved he was correct with a groundbreaking experiment in 1995. He has continued to confirm his results in a series of experiments and papers since then.
In his latest success he started with a chiral mixture with a tiny 'ee' (enantiomeric excess) of just 0.00005%. Following the autocatalytic reaction the 'ee' was over 99.5%.
The puzzle is solved.
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
I am posting my replies today.
Edge of seat, bated breath .....
the altitude problem.
mt.
everest today is 29042 feet high and i know some will say it.
now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.
now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.
our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.
My buddy with the Masters in Linguistics.. Just happens to be here watching Dr.Phil with me..
Yeah of course he is.
