cofty

Joined

• started 464 topics
• posted 24,957 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by cofty

• 
  218

  Debating With Evolution Deniers is Just Like This

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  ha! You are citing a paper on genetics from 1950.

  I know you are a bit behind the times but that is incredible!
• 
  218

  Debating With Evolution Deniers is Just Like This

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  Your post does nothing to support your false claim that there are no neutral mutations.

  An animal that has a harmful near-neutral mutation...

  I am not talking about a "harmful near-neutral mutation" - whatever your made up term is supposed to mean? I am talking about totally neutral mutations.

  You are refusing to reply to the evidence of DNA functional redundancy and Protein functional redundancy.
  

  
  

  
  
• 
  218

  Debating With Evolution Deniers is Just Like This

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  in fact, we now know there is function and effects

  No you don't. The human genome has a huge proportion of DNA that has no function. There is a single-cell archezoa that has an order of magnitude more DNA than humans. There are onions and rice plants that have bigger genomes than microbiologists. Obviously it is mostly freeloading junk. But that is another thread.

  You claimed that there is no such thing as a neutral mutation. I proved that this is false with the example of Cytochrome C.

  As usual you changed the goalposts - the irony.
• 
  22

  what a wonderful site!

  by scruffmcbuff in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  ive been reading through this forum for a while and thought i should contribute!.

  so im df, i was very involved regular pioneer for several years and i slowly started to wake up.. my exprience of leaving is horendous and contains alot of shocking (but apparently not that rare in the orgs) judicials and various encounters with the elders.. ive been out 10 years now and at 27 loving life!

  running a succesful business and dont all thay materialistic stuff thata frowned apon, like providing my wife and kids with a nice car and house!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  HI welcome to the forum. Congratulations on your freedom. Looking forward to your posts.
• 
  218

  Debating With Evolution Deniers is Just Like This

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  The irony of this thread is epic!
• 
  218

  Debating With Evolution Deniers is Just Like This

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  Only thing they prove is that I can read and write and that I have studied a few books on the subject - Vidqun

  Actually you claimed to be a highly qualified professional microbiologist. Therefore I can hold you to a higher standard of scientific accuracy. So far you are failing appallingly.

  For example consider this nonsense...

  Sorry to burst your bubble, but there is no such thing as a neutral mutation

  Oh dear.

  Any point mutation in the vast non-coding regions of the genome have no effect at all on anything. They are genuinely neutral.

  This is because nucleotides take up space, affect spacing between other nucleotide sites

  All introns are spliced out before translation. Changes to introns are neutral.

  Changes to exons are also frequently neutral. As a microbiologist you will be well aware of the facts of DNA functional redundancy and protein functional redundancy.

  There are more viable versions of the gene for the respiratory protein cytochrome C than there are atoms in the known universe. Comparison of sequences of species reflects the evolutionary relationships we already know from other types of evidence.

  It is possible to splice the gene from yeast and implant it in a mammal and it will work perfectly. How much more proof do you need of the reality of neutral mutations?

  Ultimately the entire population will become extinct because essentially all "neutral" mutations are harmful

  You are the only "scientist" in the whole universe who is aware of this terrifying idea. Please publish your evidence in a peer-reviewed journal immediately.
• 
  218

  Debating With Evolution Deniers is Just Like This

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  here I have to disagree with your statement which contradicts the facts.

  My statement is 100% accurate. Cancer is a result of individual cells doing what they have done for 4 billions years - replicating.

  I call it "improvement."

  I don't care what pejorative, unscientific words you like to use.

  Why would their genes have stabilized, while other organisms would be prone to change? It's a mystery.

  No it isn't. Gene pools change in response to selection pressure. Some species change morphologically very little over long periods. However the neutral mutations of their genes proves their common ancestry with all other living things.
  

  This is very basic science.

  You may not remember, but I am a qualified Medical Microbiologist with Anatomy, Physiology and Microbiology as majors. Yes, I have a lot of books dealing with those subjects. I had to work through all of them to pass those subjects... - Vidqun 3 months ago

  My credentials are not important. - Vidqun 2 hours ago
• 
  44

  The Atheist Delusion

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  atheist delusion.

  just want to know what the ex jw community thinks about this video and also offer my pov.

  the video was actually an advertisement on here.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  there'd be a lot more skeletons around if there indeed was no God, as a lot more sodium chloride in the sea

  Eh?

  This is why rational people end up laughing disrespectfully at creationists.

  Are you really getting your science from Banana Man?

  
  
  
• 
  218

  Debating With Evolution Deniers is Just Like This

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  dog DNA > dog, cat DNA > cat, frog DNA > frog, spider DNA > spider - Vidqun

  Perhaps the most unscientific thing ever written by somebody who claimed to be a retired professional scientist.
  

  My credentials are not important.

  You made a very big deal of your credentials on a previous thread. Why are you shy about them now?
  
  
  
• 
  218

  Debating With Evolution Deniers is Just Like This

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  Cofty, you are so clever.

  Thanks. I can't return the compliment.

  From a one-celled organism to a human being, I call that improvement.

  I don't. I call it increased morphological complexity.

  Through natural selection those that die of cancer will take themselves out of the equation. It'll be survival of the fittest.

  Very few people die cancer before reaching reproductive age, so cancer has little effect on the gene pool. It is mostly a disease of age as mutations accumulate. As a professional scientist you should know that.