Only thing they prove is that I can read and write and that I have studied a few books on the subject - Vidqun
Actually you claimed to be a highly qualified professional microbiologist. Therefore I can hold you to a higher standard of scientific accuracy. So far you are failing appallingly.
For example consider this nonsense...
Sorry to burst your bubble, but there is no such thing as a neutral mutation
Oh dear.
Any point mutation in the vast non-coding regions of the genome have no effect at all on anything. They are genuinely neutral.
This is because nucleotides take up space, affect spacing between other nucleotide sites
All introns are spliced out before translation. Changes to introns are neutral.
Changes to exons are also frequently neutral. As a microbiologist you will be well aware of the facts of DNA functional redundancy and protein functional redundancy.
There are more viable versions of the gene for the respiratory protein cytochrome C than there are atoms in the known universe. Comparison of sequences of species reflects the evolutionary relationships we already know from other types of evidence.
It is possible to splice the gene from yeast and implant it in a mammal and it will work perfectly. How much more proof do you need of the reality of neutral mutations?
Ultimately the entire population will become extinct because essentially all "neutral" mutations are harmful
You are the only "scientist" in the whole universe who is aware of this terrifying idea. Please publish your evidence in a peer-reviewed journal immediately.
