cofty

Joined

• started 464 topics
• posted 24,957 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by cofty

• 
  8

  Michael Cremo and the book Fobbiden archaeology

  by Crazyguy in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  it my understanding that he's claiming that humans have lived on earth for millions of years.

  it looks as though he's even showing different archaeological findings to support his claim.

  he seams to be claiming that other inferior humanoids could not created some of the things found and i guess modern scientists would agree on that single piont.. its also if interest to find out that his religious beliefs maybe behind his ideas.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  Cremo is a peddler of woo woo...

  NCSE review...

  Talk Origins on Cremo...
• 
  138

  Jehovah God is Real

  by TakeOffTheCrown in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  there are many on this site that do not believe that jehovah truly exists; that he is not a real being.

  but, he is as real as next breath you draw into your nostrils.. some of you say that there is no evidence that he exists.

  yet, none of you can prove that he does not exits.. cofty, (you come to mind), i appreciate that you have stated, without reservation, that you do not believe that god exists.. yet, you cannot prove it.. hope in jehovah..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  TOTC on what basis do you have confidence that god exists?
• 
  138

  Jehovah God is Real

  by TakeOffTheCrown in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  there are many on this site that do not believe that jehovah truly exists; that he is not a real being.

  but, he is as real as next breath you draw into your nostrils.. some of you say that there is no evidence that he exists.

  yet, none of you can prove that he does not exits.. cofty, (you come to mind), i appreciate that you have stated, without reservation, that you do not believe that god exists.. yet, you cannot prove it.. hope in jehovah..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  Cofty, no need to do that. - TOTC

  No problem, it will be a pleasure.,
  
  
• 
  138

  Jehovah God is Real

  by TakeOffTheCrown in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  there are many on this site that do not believe that jehovah truly exists; that he is not a real being.

  but, he is as real as next breath you draw into your nostrils.. some of you say that there is no evidence that he exists.

  yet, none of you can prove that he does not exits.. cofty, (you come to mind), i appreciate that you have stated, without reservation, that you do not believe that god exists.. yet, you cannot prove it.. hope in jehovah..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  Cofty, (you come to mind), I appreciate that you have stated, without reservation, that you do not believe that God exists. Yet, you cannot prove it. - TOTC

  Yes I can prove that god does not exist.

  In this context ...

  1. "Prove" means prove beyond all reasonable doubt by objective evidence.

  2. "God" means the god of christian theism: the god and father of Jesus.

  I have already delivered on this challenge on numerous occasions but I will happily post a new thread in the near future to bring all of the main points of my argument into one place.
• 
  21

  Royal Commission Australia - Report into Jehovah's Witnesses and the Watchtower Society has been released

  by OrphanCrow in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  link to pdf:.

  http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/getattachment/c2d1f1f5-a1f2-4241-82fb-978d072734bd/report-of-case-study-no-29.

  reading it now...no comment yet.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  So what happens next?

  Will the government of Australia take action based on the report?
• 
  29

  Dr Monica Applewhite's evidence rejected by Australian Child Abuse Royal Commission

  by jwleaks in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  australian child abuse royal commission rejects dr monica applewhite's evidence and testimony.. [quote] dr applewhite acknowledged that her report did not identify the basis on which she had formed her opinions.657 she accepted that her report failed to identify the ‘current standards’ of other religious organisations658 or which ‘religious organisations’ she referred to in writing her report.659 dr applewhite told the royal commission that her understanding of material provided to parents and families about sexual development in children by other faith-based organisations was ‘anecdotal’.660.

  dr applewhite accepted that it would be difficult for the royal commission to accept the opinions expressed in paragraphs 36, 45, and 46 of her report because her report did not identify the basis on which those opinions were formed.661.

  we do not consider that dr applewhite’s report and the opinions expressed therein assist the royal commission in its inquiry for the following reasons:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  The report is limited to an opinion about the documented policies and other material rather than about the practical application and effect of those documented policies.

  She is either lazy or willing to say whatever she is paid to say.
  
  
• 
  15

  Acts 15,19-21 James on Dietary Law and Blood ( some of the oldest available manuscripts with the passage)

  by TheWonderofYou in

  1. watchtower
  2. medical

  the bible manuscript below is a picture of the p45 (gregory aland number) from the 3rd century.

  i have cut out the passage of acts 15,19-21 from the greek text.

  you can compare the p45 with the greek text from nestle aland.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  Thank you. Really interesting stuff. Marking to read in detail this evening.
• 
  46

  New Resolution?

  by NikL in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  had our midweek meeting last night.

  they had a resolution to send an extra (i wanna say $1100 but i only remember it was at least $1000) per month to forward the kingdom preaching work etc.. you know how they work in the kh...no one votes against anything.

  i abstained as i almost have always done.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  That picture of hungry grandma is ethically shameful.

  They have reached a new low.
• 
  86

  Free Speech - Jordan Peterson Debate Live 9:30 EST Saturday

  by cofty in

  1. social
  2. current

  professor jordan peterson of the university of toronto will be streaming a live debate on his youtube channel on the topic of free speech and "bill c-16".. if you haven't heard (where have you been?

  ) peterson has been making waves by opposing the demands of pc "social justice warriors" at the u of t to use their chosen gender neutral pronouns.

  in his judgement proposed "bill-c16" will make his non-compliance illegal - an egregious threat to free speech.. professor peterson is an intelligent and thoughtful academic who has found himself at the focus of attacks from the neo-marxists that are dominating the conversation at elite universities.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  Thanks Simon.

  Will listen to it this evening and see if he makes a convincing case.

  apparently there is a right wing commentator, on Fox News... - SBF

  You could finish that phrase with absolutely any foolishness imaginable.
  
  
• 
  86

  Free Speech - Jordan Peterson Debate Live 9:30 EST Saturday

  by cofty in

  1. social
  2. current

  professor jordan peterson of the university of toronto will be streaming a live debate on his youtube channel on the topic of free speech and "bill c-16".. if you haven't heard (where have you been?

  ) peterson has been making waves by opposing the demands of pc "social justice warriors" at the u of t to use their chosen gender neutral pronouns.

  in his judgement proposed "bill-c16" will make his non-compliance illegal - an egregious threat to free speech.. professor peterson is an intelligent and thoughtful academic who has found himself at the focus of attacks from the neo-marxists that are dominating the conversation at elite universities.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  cofty

  Very interesting points Bohm thank you for your input.

  I enjoy forum conversations most when people explain with evidence and reason why I may be wrong. I appreciate it.

  I have often been accused on the forum of being unwilling to ever admit being wrong. It's not true. I just need reasons to convince me. Being in a minority of one isn't ever a reason.

  I will watch developments with interest.

  By the way I agree that Trump poses an egregious threat to free speech.