atheism = self defeating.
first may we define our terms.
the word atheism comes literally from the greek, alpha the negative and theos [for god], therefore “negative god” or there is no god.
"But who are you, a human being, to talk back to God?"
Paul said a lot of stupid things. Maybe he trembled in god's presence. Doesn't mean we have to be so gullible.
Their conception of God often included the idea that his qualities are difficult to reconcile
Yes they talked a lot of self-contradictory bollocks. Surely you noticed that when you read the bible? We are all a lot wiser than anybody who contributed to the bible.
... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
Not my conclusions Fishy the plain testimony of scripture.
The bible says eating the unbled flesh of an animal found already dead resulted only in being unclean until the evening.
You have all your work ahead of you.
... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
Killing an animal and eating its blood is a crime.
Any Israelite or any foreigner residing among you who hunts any animal or bird that may be eaten must drain out the blood and cover it with earth, because the life of every creature is its blood. That is why I have said to the Israelites, “You must not eat the blood of any creature, because the life of every creature is its blood; anyone who eats it must be cut off.” - Lev.17:13,14
Finding a dead animal and eating its unbled flesh is not a crime.
Anyone, whether native-born or foreigner, who eats anything found dead or torn by wild animals must wash their clothes and bathe with water, and they will be ceremonially unclean till evening; then they will be clean. - Lev.17:15
Please explain the difference Fishy and reconcile it with Deut 14. Don't just keep repeating the same phrase out of context.
atheism = self defeating.
first may we define our terms.
the word atheism comes literally from the greek, alpha the negative and theos [for god], therefore “negative god” or there is no god.
There is nothing in that video that addresses my point. The guy that witters on about earthquakes is an ignorant buffoon.
atheism = self defeating.
first may we define our terms.
the word atheism comes literally from the greek, alpha the negative and theos [for god], therefore “negative god” or there is no god.
Designing a world that inevitably blows up and randomly kills millions of its inhabitants is not something an all-powerful and loving god would do.
Either he is a bad designer or a sadist.
Either way he is not the god of christian theism.
This is not a bold claim.
... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
Ok you are obviously struggling so here is a clue.
Look at the context of the three texts. There is no contradiction.
Lev.11 is about clean and unclean food. It says that if a clean animal dies of itself it becomes unclean. Obviously it can't be bled but there is no mention of blood in this context. If the animal's owner buries it he becomes unclean by touching it. If he eats it he becomes unclean just the same. There was no penalty for eating it or burying it. Being unclean was not a crime. Having sex with your wife made you unclean.
Deut.14 is a restating of the same law given after the wilderness years. Again there is no mention of blood but Moses encourages the people to sell the dead animal to a foreigner. This doesn't nullify the former law but provides an option that avoids unnecessary uncleanness. Similarly the priests had additional laws that went beyond those that applied to the rest of the nation. They had to make special effort to remain clean to serve at the Tabernacle. Among these additional restrictions was that unlike everybody else eating an animal found dead was not an option for them as it was for everybody else.
Lev.17 is about blood. Please read the chapter in its entirety and notice the clear contrast. If an Israelite killed an animal and ate it unbled that was a serious crime. If he ate an unbled animal fond already dead that only resulted in being unclean until the evening.
... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
Yes. So how are you going to reconcile the apparent contradiction between Leviticus and Deuteronomy?
I explained it in full in my article.
The answer is very simple. Do you want a hint?
atheism = self defeating.
first may we define our terms.
the word atheism comes literally from the greek, alpha the negative and theos [for god], therefore “negative god” or there is no god.
morals would have been selected on either pragmatic or utilitarian bases, because that view aims at survival and not truth
What do you mean by moral truth?
atheism = self defeating.
first may we define our terms.
the word atheism comes literally from the greek, alpha the negative and theos [for god], therefore “negative god” or there is no god.
There is no possible reason for an omnipotent loving god to booby-trap the planet and violently kill millions of the humans he claims to love. To claim otherwise without offering a sensible reason is dishonest.
there are many millions of believers who do believe in God who are well aware of suffering.
Not one of them has a sensible answer. When you ask them for an explanation they all obfuscate.
... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
The verses you quoted do not invalidate Numbers 15:30,31, It stands
Num.15:30,31 says that anybody who wilfully breaks the law must be cut off. It says nothing about blood. Not one word,
There was no law against eating an animal found already dead as I proved with the quotes from Lev.11 and Lev.17.
Therefore Number 15 has no relevance to the subject of blood.
