Again, you conclude in your argument that blood is not sacred to God. - Fishy
I have consistently said the exact opposite throughout this thread. Blood is sacred to god and anybody who broke god's law on blood was to be cut off.
Your argument does not show that. Lev 17 shows that an animal slaughtered for food must be drained of its blood before it can be eaten.
This is gibberish. I have no idea what you are trying to say. Do you? Just to be clear an animal killed for food had to be bled otherwise the culprit was to be cut off.
It also shows that if an unbled animal is eaten by an Israelite, he is required to bathe ceremonially.
Yes I have said this hundreds of times. If an animal was found dead and eaten unbled there was no punishment. The person had to relax in a nice warm bath and put on a clean robe. Lamb cutlets, hot bath, clean clothes = luxury.
Nothing is said about blood not being sacred to God. You conclude that in you argument.
Blood is not even mentioned in Lev.17:15 It is all about ceremonial cleanness not blood
It does not say that you can take any sort of blood and eat it or do anything with it.
Of course it doesn't. I have said that repeatedly. It DOES say that if you ate the unbled carcass of an animal found already dead there was no punishment.
You confuse your conclusions from what you read in Bible from what the text says.
No I have consistently made a clear distinction and stuck rigidly to the word of scripture.
You do that in every thread even as the venetator of theory of evolution that you worship- but that is another topic.
What is a venetator?
Your reconciliaton of scriptures and all the other trash that you post is only your opinion and nothing more.
Every single word is solidly based on a simple reading of the text with respect for the context.
Now - my two questions.