projecting intentional agency to others that some say only religious people have
nobody says that.
"Scientism" is a word used by silly people who fear evidence.
evolution explains how everything descended from a common ancestor over millions of years.
creationists only seem to want to talk about what came before that common ancestor.
just for the sake of discussion let's pretend that the following is true.
projecting intentional agency to others that some say only religious people have
nobody says that.
"Scientism" is a word used by silly people who fear evidence.
so many evolutionist's on this forum are upset at the terror attacks in europe such as recently in sweden.
it is just a logical step in the evolution of the human race.
should you not rather be celebrating the great changes taking place right before your eyes and constructing detailed explanations of the cell structure and dna development in the human brain.. you can't eat your cake and still have it.
Your arguments about the law are a red herring.
The Law does not hold a five year old responsible for their actions. Five year olds have consciousness.
There is no evidence that humans are anything other than biology.
i'm just thinking aloud here.
i watched a show yesterday and they were talking about how the largest mammals of the sea (whales) fed on such small creatures (plankton) rather than eating some other large creatures.
anyway, it got me thinking about how as jws we thought that in paradise animals would all be herbivores, that they would no longer eat other animals.
Even as a loyal JW elder I did not believe the animal kingdom would/could ever become vegetarian.
Perhaps that was the first signs of "independent thinking".
... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
Really? That's your contribution to this thread?
so many evolutionist's on this forum are upset at the terror attacks in europe such as recently in sweden.
it is just a logical step in the evolution of the human race.
should you not rather be celebrating the great changes taking place right before your eyes and constructing detailed explanations of the cell structure and dna development in the human brain.. you can't eat your cake and still have it.
The Law does not comment on whether humans have a metaphysical dimension. Stop playing word games.
... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
Really?
You commented three times in a thread about a life-and-death issue to complain that you think there might be a grammar error.
Shouldn't that be - The Watchtower am Right About Blood...?
No it shouldn't. Obviously.
so many evolutionist's on this forum are upset at the terror attacks in europe such as recently in sweden.
it is just a logical step in the evolution of the human race.
should you not rather be celebrating the great changes taking place right before your eyes and constructing detailed explanations of the cell structure and dna development in the human brain.. you can't eat your cake and still have it.
Can anybody be bothered to converse with EQV? I can't.
He seems unaware that the majority of christians have no problem with the fact of evolution. Creationists are a sub-group of hyper-ignorant theists found mostly among Protestant evangelicals and Muslims.
Their ignorance of science is matched only by their ignorance of their own ignorance.
so many evolutionist's on this forum are upset at the terror attacks in europe such as recently in sweden.
it is just a logical step in the evolution of the human race.
should you not rather be celebrating the great changes taking place right before your eyes and constructing detailed explanations of the cell structure and dna development in the human brain.. you can't eat your cake and still have it.
Liking you or not we have a lot of reasons to assume we are more than biology. - John_Man
No there are no reasons at all. Not even one. Endless repetition doesn't make it so.
Not only religious reasons... That comes later, you know, after death... The real Judgement will take place
I don't give a flying fuck about your post-mortem threats. That is the tactic you Catholics have used to oppress and defraud the weak and the poor for millennia. It doesn't work anymore. get over it.
"Scientism" is a silly, made-up word used by superstitious people who can't support their evidence-free dogma.
... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
You have made the same post three times - yes all three did show up on thread.
I didn't understand it the first time and repeating twice hasn't helped any.
I have never had more than one account on this forum.
so many evolutionist's on this forum are upset at the terror attacks in europe such as recently in sweden.
it is just a logical step in the evolution of the human race.
should you not rather be celebrating the great changes taking place right before your eyes and constructing detailed explanations of the cell structure and dna development in the human brain.. you can't eat your cake and still have it.
"but have three souls and of course there is no evidence because it is metaphysical and to ask for evidence is scientism...."
and so on and so on ad infinitum.