Your position is scientism does not exist? Yes or not? - J_M
Perhaps somewhere there is somebody who deserves the label - I don't know I have never encountered such a person. Nobody even seems able to agree on a concise definition of the word.
Can't you see you personally is a follower of scientism in denial?
That is total nonsense. You have yet to show one single example of anything I have ever said in over 20,000 posts that would justify your accusation.
You claimed that anybody who asks for scientific evidence of god is guilty of scientism. By that definition almost everybody who has ever lived is that group. It is the most foolish thing I have ever read from a theist on this forum. You just keep redefining science until it is so narrow it excludes everything you find inconvenient.
You are also a hypocrite because you said your faith was built at least in part on three specific miracles. All such events are subject to examination of the evidence. As soon as somebody asks for evidence you scream "scientism". It is pure intellectual dishonesty and cowardice.
You also avoid every difficult question you are asked.