Morality is a social construct. - Redvip200
Could a society prosper if it valued theft, rape and murder as moral virtues? - Me
That is an adjudication - Fisherman
Eh?
some people believe that stealing, lying and killing, is not moral.
some people don't.. does morality exist?
if so, prove it..
Morality is a social construct. - Redvip200
Could a society prosper if it valued theft, rape and murder as moral virtues? - Me
That is an adjudication - Fisherman
Eh?
some people believe that stealing, lying and killing, is not moral.
some people don't.. does morality exist?
if so, prove it..
Fisherman - You started an interesting conversation. Three different people offered you responses to your question and you responded with the two words - "says who".
Have you lost interest in it already?
some people believe that stealing, lying and killing, is not moral.
some people don't.. does morality exist?
if so, prove it..
Redvip200 - I'm curious about what you are basing that on. Do you really believe all moral statements are simply social constructs?
Do you deny there is such a thing as human nature? Could a society prosper if it valued theft, rape and murder as moral virtues?
Perhaps I have misunderstood your point.
a friend of mine has contacts to a family with several circuit overseers and special pioneers.
they have good connections to bethel.. he told me that the latest rumor from bethel states that the cos should be abolished in their present form.
they have also recently begun to take cos back to bethel.. over the same channel i have already heard of the car fleet program and that the dos should be abolished.. has anyone else already heard of it?
Annon wins comment of the week!
I'm puzzled why Fall Guy asserts that COs cost the organisation nothing. The Year Book says otherwise.
just wanted to say a big hello to everyone, my first post on here was actually yesterday but it was deleted.. so will keep this one short to save my precious time just in case its also deleted or lost.. got fed up with years of persecution from within the congregations.
the lack of genuine friendship & lack of 'christian love'.
having personally seen many a scandalous behaviour i began doing some research online some years ago.
Hi LU welcome to the forum. Plenty of Brits around here, I'm from up north - Berwick.
Best wishes.
some people believe that stealing, lying and killing, is not moral.
some people don't.. does morality exist?
if so, prove it..
Fisherman when you are posting on multiple threads at the same time please try to post your comments to the correct one.
some people believe that stealing, lying and killing, is not moral.
some people don't.. does morality exist?
if so, prove it..
Okay let's look at your tattoo example...
I respect people's rights but I feel very very hurt to see someone with tattoos all over their body. It does not hurt people from having them but it hurts me - Fisherman
This is an excellent illustration of a moral puzzle.
Is it anybody else's business if somebody gets a tattoo and can it ever be immoral or unethical to do so?
I personally don't think it is as simple as "live and let live". All healthy humans have a moral instinct for sanctity/degradation. It has helped to protect our ancestors for thousands of years. We avoid contact with things that look, feel or smell repulsive. We view our bodies as needing to be guarded from contamination.
For example it is this instinct that has led religions to label sex unhelpfully as "dirty". It is probably this same instinct that makes you recoil from the sight of excessive tattoos. There is a lady in Edinburgh who advertises as the most tattooed lady in the world. I too find her appearance repellent.
So where does the problem lie? Is it with the person who brazenly ignores the feelings of others or with others who would like to put their feelings ahead of individual freedoms? If the latter, then what about those who wish to challenge our sense of sanctity far more extreme ways. Where should we draw a line?
My point is not to provide an answer but to show that these things are legitimate moral questions that are concerned with the well-being of other creatures and that have roots in our social evolution.
some people believe that stealing, lying and killing, is not moral.
some people don't.. does morality exist?
if so, prove it..
I was thinking in terms of when creatures are not affected like when people dump trash for example and it affects the beauty and naturalness of nature - Fisherman
Of course other creatures are affected by pollution. You are struggling to think of an actual example of a moral action that does not impact the wellbeing of others aren't you?
some people believe that stealing, lying and killing, is not moral.
some people don't.. does morality exist?
if so, prove it..
How about actions that affect non concious beings like throwing garbage into the ocean?
The moral dimension of dumping rubbish in the ocean comes from the fact that conscious creatures will be affected by our pollution.
We could happily dispense with the words morality and ethics and nothing would change. We would still be concerned about the implications of our actions on the well-being of other creatures. They are just convenient labels.
some people believe that stealing, lying and killing, is not moral.
some people don't.. does morality exist?
if so, prove it..
I agree with SBF's sandcastle illustration. There is no such thing as absolute morality.
Morality is just the name we give to our concerns about how our actions affect other conscious beings. So yes of course it exists.
I think you need to think through your question a bit more.