"molecules don't care about life.
" first part deals with abiogenesis and the state of current research.
second part stephen meyer proposes intelligent design as an explanation of some of the problems.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bss0rxpsbuq.
There are no books that present a scientific case for biological evolution
I just typed 'biological evolution evidence' into Google Scholar and got 3.73 million results.
Why should anybody take you seriously when you have not read a single word of the evidence that you arrogantly dismiss?
re-posting this for reference.. #1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
Our genome shows that our creator used similar types of code in different organisms He created
Actually no it doesn't show any such thing.
Imagine you are a teacher and you suspect that some of your pupils have been copying each other's essays. When you challenge them they claim that they are innocent and the similarities only show that they all used the same sources for their research.
How would you show beyond all doubt that one or more of them had in fact been cheating?
(PS - cut down on the personal insults and stick to facts please)
"molecules don't care about life.
" first part deals with abiogenesis and the state of current research.
second part stephen meyer proposes intelligent design as an explanation of some of the problems.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bss0rxpsbuq.
EP - I thought you might want to have an intelligent conversation about the evidence. Do you or are you only interested in silly point-scoring?
I will ask you the same question I have asked literally dozens of creationists on this forum - without one honest reply!
What books that present the scientific case for biological evolution have you read?
I predict you will either not reply or obfuscate or lie. So far I have never been wrong about this.
"molecules don't care about life.
" first part deals with abiogenesis and the state of current research.
second part stephen meyer proposes intelligent design as an explanation of some of the problems.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bss0rxpsbuq.
The conscience is not designed for "advancement of the species" like some kind of sexual competition for passing on genes the way evolutionary theorists purport.
I have no idea what you mean. What do we 'purport' exactly?
"molecules don't care about life.
" first part deals with abiogenesis and the state of current research.
second part stephen meyer proposes intelligent design as an explanation of some of the problems.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bss0rxpsbuq.
I am never angry when discussing evolution. Why would I be? I have ALL the evidence on my side.
Debating with creationists is mostly fun.
re-posting this for reference.. #1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
You can do a genome test if you want. We all have a common ancestor
And our genome testifies to our close ancestry to other primates.
Exactly the same sort of genetic evidence that is used to prove paternity shows beside all doubt that we share a common ancestry with all other living things.
re-posting this for reference.. #1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
FFS
"molecules don't care about life.
" first part deals with abiogenesis and the state of current research.
second part stephen meyer proposes intelligent design as an explanation of some of the problems.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bss0rxpsbuq.
Truth is decided by cold hard evidence not feelings.
Evolution is one such cold hard fact.
"molecules don't care about life.
" first part deals with abiogenesis and the state of current research.
second part stephen meyer proposes intelligent design as an explanation of some of the problems.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bss0rxpsbuq.
EP - How on earth did you fall for creationism as an adult?
"molecules don't care about life.
" first part deals with abiogenesis and the state of current research.
second part stephen meyer proposes intelligent design as an explanation of some of the problems.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bss0rxpsbuq.
Take your pick and let's stick to evidence.
