excuse me so called holy spirit directed governing body; what do you do when you discover that a long term hospital liaison committee elder who gives talks at all1 day assemblies, 2 day assemblies & district assemblies and is quite prominent n the victorian/nsw circuit, is addicted to pornography, particularly under age and bestiality porno?
and oh, if you have print outs of his internet log ins and internet history fully detailing his log ins from his work computer???
and im not talking breach of privacy, im talking his breach of work usage of computers, of which im in charge of the it.
addicted to pornography, particularly under age and bestiality porno
All the web links showed "legal cheerleaders/college girls/babysitters
This is the crux of the matter. Is it underage, child porn or not? If so its a legal matter you don't have a dilemma. If not then you have a lot of power, how will you use it?
evolutionists always claim that the reason why they believe in evolution and reject creation is due to "evidence".
they frequently use the opposite term "no evidence" in relation to any type of intelligent design, or creation, (and especially to genesis creation and flood history !).
their advocated beliefs always tend to include whatever is necessary to believe in to intellectually "explain" the existence of the universe, world, and its creatures without needing god).
By "Evolution" (capital "E") I mean the complete evolutionary naturalist version of history (molecules to man), not merely "evolution" in the limited sense of mere biological "change" (which of course everyone including Biblical creationists accept)
This is a distiction without a difference that only exists in the mind of creationists. Its like saying, "I believe its possible for a human to walk to the next town but no way is it possible to walk all the way from coast to coast." Evolution is evolution - change over time; litttle changes add up to big changes.
you spent months,years or even decades as a christian.you sacrificed everything for god,gave him everything you had,you would speak every day for him to others and would live as a person dedicated to god.what did you receive in return after all your efforts?did he help you when you were in need?if yes,are you 100% sure that he was the one who helped you?could you feel his holy spirit in your life?.
p.s:this topic has nothing to do with the org.
i am talking exclusively about god and your relationship with him.
On too many occasions to relate there were incidents where I was certain that god had made good things happen for me or had made a bad situation turn out for the best. This was both as a JW and especially during the next 9 years as a christian.
Now I am an atheist things are no different. Life is still a mixture of good and bad, disapointments, surprises and happy coincidences. It is in our nature to ascribe everything to a cause - its an instinct that helped our survival.
The real difference now is that I no longer have to hide from the difficult question of why an interventionist god plays favourites with his children.
evolutionists always claim that the reason why they believe in evolution and reject creation is due to "evidence".
they frequently use the opposite term "no evidence" in relation to any type of intelligent design, or creation, (and especially to genesis creation and flood history !).
their advocated beliefs always tend to include whatever is necessary to believe in to intellectually "explain" the existence of the universe, world, and its creatures without needing god).
They always claim that these beliefs(no matter what they are) are "backed by evidence" ; "overwhelming evidence" etc, repeat, evidence; etc, repeat, evidence; etc..
If "they" only CLAIMED they had overwhelming evidence you could have a point. In fact they also supply the evidence by the bucket load. I agree it takes a lot of time and effort to assess the evidence objectively.
Personally I don't "believe" in evolution; I just accept the evidence - same as I don't "believe" in gravity.
in an effort to increase the praise and honor to jehovah and jesus christ at the time of the memorial, the governing body has arranged for a special period of increased activity during april 2011.
you will be pleased to learn that during april 2011, publishers who wish to serve as auxiliary pioneers may indicate on the application whether they will be working toward a 30-hour or 50-hour requirement for the month.
this is a special arrangement for the month of april 2011 only.
If I remember right our requirement was 1000 per year but if we got less than 90 in any month we had to put the reason on the back of the "pnk slip"
Play the Hitler card and you are out
Well done - any infringement of Godwin's Law is an automatic fail
Both groups are absolutely convinced that God does NOT hate them.
hahaha - good point
Does the same apply with a Christian debating an atheist?
Of course, always demand evidence to back up claims.
In his speech at TED Dawkins referred to a spoof scientific paper on the fate of the dinosaurs. Here are the list of essays...
1. The president of the Royal Society has been vouchsafed a strong inner conviction that an asteroid killed the dinosaurs
2. It has been privately revealed to professor Huxtane that an asteroid killed the dinosaurs
3. Professor Hauldley was brought up to have total and unquestioning faith that an asteroid killed the dinosaurs
4. Professor Hawkins has promulgated an official dogma binding on all loyal Hawkinsians that an asteroid killed the dinosaurs
Now if an atheist ever appeals to logic like that then yes you should refuse to debte with them.
in your arm by judge's order.
(a judge will be there at the checkpoint) and of course, if you are legally drunk, you'll be arrested on the spot.. so this weekend in tampa, they'll be sticking needles in your arms if you refuse their demands.
they say they'll be heavily advertising the area that they'll be at over the holiday..
what happens if a person is unable to supply a breath test due to a medical condition or extremely high level of intoxication - tenyearsafter
The police will always ask if there is a medical reason why they can't use a breath test. In that case I think they are given the option of blood or urine testing. The limit is 107 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of urine.
If somebody is so badly drunk they can't do any of the above they will spend the night in the cells and be charged in the morning when they are sober enough to understand. I know the courts will accept calculations of blood levels based on a sample taken many hours later in cases like this.
Incidently they always breath test both drivers at every accident they attend.
Last year I was coming home very late one night approx 3 am on a rural road near my home there was a car in the ditch. I was fetching my son who had been partying in town. The young male driver was wandering around in the middle of the vey dark road on a bend. I offered to give him a lift home but he became abusive, so I called the police who picked him up a few minutes later. He wa so drunk he didn't get charged until the following morning. I have no sympathy for him, he could have killed somebody.
