There has been no advancement in the answer to how RNA became DNA. - Hadriel
I gave you the names of three scientists working at the cutting edge of this field and recommended a book that explains it.
You really have zero interest in the answer.
Every time you pose the "question" it changes.
First you rejected the idea of a RNA world
Then you demand to know how RNA could give rise to DNA
Then you insist the real problem has something to do with amino acids being "charged".
Then it's all about what catalyst was involved in connecting amino acids together.
Is it one or all of these that troubles you or is just the origin of life in general?