It's because the rest of your argument is based on a hypothetical where you project your biases and disdain for the opposing view.
Origin-of-life science is all about hypotheses. What did you expect?
I expressed my total contempt for SBF's bullshit attempt to destroy the conversation before it began. I am very interested in opposing views on this topic. That is why I started it. I find Vidqun's previous post to be very honest and interesting. Basically he, like many other theists are hoping it will never happen.
There's no real substance added with this post other than it just being a starting point for the ever going origin of life debate, which I know you love being a part of, but, usually your posts are substantive.
Yes. Forgive me for not spending hours over every OP I write. Just most of them.
Another thread outlining the latest developments in bio-genesis research would have been much more instructive and constructive.
I might do that. The point of this thread is to talk about how success in origin-of-life science would impact on theism. I think it is interesting.