i was wondering what is the most interesting or the strangest fact you've found out since leaving the jws about:.
the bible.
god .
Evolution: It will always remain a theory since we cannot travel back in time - scratchme
A scientific theory does not mean something less than a fact. It is an explanation for a whole body of facts and observations. It is itself a fact as certain as anything else you can claim to know beyond all reasonable doubt.
Sorry this is off-topic but it is such a basic misunderstanding that has been explained countless times in the past.
last week’s newsweek magazine (february 10, 2018) made a surgical strike on jws teaching that soul is something that can be “destroyed” (mathew 10:28) and man is ‘dust unto which he would return’ (genesis 3:19) when its article (the increasing signs that human consciousness remains after death) made this conclusion: soul “does not become annihilated just because we’ve crossed the threshold of death.” (http://www.newsweek.com/where-do-you-go-when-you-die-increasing-signs-human-consciousness-after-death-800443) interestingly, bible also contains verses that show man has an eternal aspect (eccl 3:5; 12:7).. science is now in the right direction in line with the prediction francis crick, co-discoverer of the double-helix dna, made: “it is not true that mere firing of neurons in the brain could indicate consciousness….
physics has yet to explain how consciousness could come about through firing of neuron in the brain.”.
this also explains why some of the gospels were not included in the canon.
arover - How would you define that difference exactly?
i was in a suburb of cardiff, capital of wales where it was difficult to get near to my customer's offices to deliver and install what i do.
i had my car parked about a hundred yards away and had to make several trips with goods and tools past a local jw trolley cart.
as i was working i didn't stop but observed much of the time from an upper floor office window.. in the hour or so i was there, on a warm sunny (for late february) lunchtime/early afternoon - right by a bus stop and several local shops, cafes and banks with plenty of people about - not one person stopped at the cart.. the two women at the cart i guess were about 50 and 75 respectively - pleasant looking motherly/grandmotherly types.
'The good news of this website will be declared in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations and then the end will come.'
last week’s newsweek magazine (february 10, 2018) made a surgical strike on jws teaching that soul is something that can be “destroyed” (mathew 10:28) and man is ‘dust unto which he would return’ (genesis 3:19) when its article (the increasing signs that human consciousness remains after death) made this conclusion: soul “does not become annihilated just because we’ve crossed the threshold of death.” (http://www.newsweek.com/where-do-you-go-when-you-die-increasing-signs-human-consciousness-after-death-800443) interestingly, bible also contains verses that show man has an eternal aspect (eccl 3:5; 12:7).. science is now in the right direction in line with the prediction francis crick, co-discoverer of the double-helix dna, made: “it is not true that mere firing of neurons in the brain could indicate consciousness….
physics has yet to explain how consciousness could come about through firing of neuron in the brain.”.
this also explains why some of the gospels were not included in the canon.
Ireneaus - As Earnest said correctly the article is reporting on recent discoveries about the process of death - it is not an instantaneous event.
The last paragraphs of the article are not reporting on any scientific findings but on unsubstantiated rumours, at least some of which have proven to be fraudulent.
Your comment that, 'Science is now in the right direction in line with the prediction Francis Crick', is unwarranted. There is no scientific support for consciousness after death. On the contrary everything that neuroscience has discovered in recent years supports the conclusion that we are our brains.
some doubt about the bible completely, some partially.
what if the bible turns out to be a product of humans, nothing divine.
would you still believe in a creator?.
that statement implies that a Creator must be a god moral and must be perfect which is not necessarily the case - ElderEtta
This highlights the pointlessness of vague questions about 'god'. First define god and then we can talk.
Let's deal with gods one at a time. 'Natural Evil' proves that the god of xtian theism does not exist.
i've been pondering on this question for awhile now, and i'm starting to think this malevolent spirit creature isn't real.
.
do you guys believe satan is real?
l left the cult the day l turned 15 - atomant
Was that a few weeks ago?
some doubt about the bible completely, some partially.
what if the bible turns out to be a product of humans, nothing divine.
would you still believe in a creator?.
This is typical of the intellectual dishonesty of some xtians who resort to arguing for a vague concept of a first cause when what they actually mean is the god who will burn you in hell if you doubt his existence.
i've been pondering on this question for awhile now, and i'm starting to think this malevolent spirit creature isn't real.
.
do you guys believe satan is real?
Sorry if l touched raw nerves about peoples prior belief systems - atomant
Why would anybody be sensitive about their prior beliefs on a ex-JW forum?
It's your current belief in superstitions that you ought to be embarrassed about.
here you go slimboyfat:where does the church of scotland stand?https://we.tl/fjix20cose.
credit goes to jaydee for this one.atlantis!.
Excellent!
i've been pondering on this question for awhile now, and i'm starting to think this malevolent spirit creature isn't real.
.
do you guys believe satan is real?
atomant - that might be the dumbest post in the history of the internet.
