by evolution or by creation?
by evolution or by creation?
"the bible is a myth" and "evolution is true".
Prove what SBF has suggested is wrong - Earnest
Which suggestion of SBF are you referring to?
The fantasy where he suggests that a god of love can randomly kill hundreds of thousands of men, women and children and destroy the lives of millions more, and then reverse time and space to make it all better...
or...
the one where he callously dismisses human suffering as victims just taking themselves too seriously?
by evolution or by creation?
by evolution or by creation?
"the bible is a myth" and "evolution is true".
Any idiot can do that
I see what you did there.
SBF's absurdity is not worth further attention. Most of my refutations have been totally ignored by SBF as usual.
by evolution or by creation?
by evolution or by creation?
"the bible is a myth" and "evolution is true".
if you cannot verify it or falsify it then it remains an opinion
Non-contradiction is not a subjective argument or a matter of opinion.
SBF - With apologists like you theism doesn't need critics. Just keep talking. Have you got any clue how ridiculous - and callous - you sound?
by evolution or by creation?
by evolution or by creation?
"the bible is a myth" and "evolution is true".
Now you have sunk to the depths of complete absurdity!
It's like saying the abusive husband is actually a loving husband as long as he finds a way to make it up to her for all the years of wife-beating.
But more importantly you are still ignoring the necessity that the god of xtian theism must always act consistently with his own self-proclaimed standards of love otherwise he cannot exist.
I have never seen a more pathetic example of special pleading.
by evolution or by creation?
by evolution or by creation?
"the bible is a myth" and "evolution is true".
SBF - tell this child he is just taking himself too seriously if he thinks his suffering matters very much.
by evolution or by creation?
by evolution or by creation?
"the bible is a myth" and "evolution is true".
Whereas some atheists appear to be convinced that God must conform to their standard of goodness or he should not or cannot exist
It's as if you are determined to twist everything I say - oh wait a minute!
The god of xtian theism must conform to his own self-proclaimed standard of love or that god of xtian theism cannot exist.
by evolution or by creation?
by evolution or by creation?
"the bible is a myth" and "evolution is true".
Plus the problem of evil doesn't rule out God because there may be an answer we simply don't know, or cannot know. My own suspicion, no doubt very unpopular, is that we humans take ourselves too seriously when we think our suffereing matters very much. ... - SBF
Please anybody reading this go ahead and click the link and check the context. You will see SBF is lying when he accuses me of distortions.
by evolution or by creation?
by evolution or by creation?
"the bible is a myth" and "evolution is true".
I see you haven't backed away from putting words in my mouth
I'm happy to look for the quote and provide a link so anybody can check the context. I was stunned!
by evolution or by creation?
by evolution or by creation?
"the bible is a myth" and "evolution is true".
How about trying to understand perspectives other than your own
I understand the perspective of theism perfectly.
by evolution or by creation?
by evolution or by creation?
"the bible is a myth" and "evolution is true".
They trust that God has the answer
Since the most fundamental claim of xtianity is contradicted by objective reality what basis could there be for claiming that the god of Jesus exists?
You are putting the dilemma arse-backwards.
First present evidence that the god of Jesus - the god who is love - exists then and only then you can address the problem of natural evil.
Since there is no evidence for the god of Jesus and the facts of reality contradict the most fundamental claims about this god, you are left with nothing.
Or maybe orphaned children of the tsunami just take themselves too seriously.
