That would also explain why no mammals of earliest fossils
Earliest fossils are of prokaryotic life more than 3 billion years ago. Mammals didn't evolve until 160 million years ago.
entire world used to be covered by water.
i am not talking about the 'great flood', but on earth's formation itself.
the bible talks about earth being only water and then god making dry land appear.
That would also explain why no mammals of earliest fossils
Earliest fossils are of prokaryotic life more than 3 billion years ago. Mammals didn't evolve until 160 million years ago.
entire world used to be covered by water.
i am not talking about the 'great flood', but on earth's formation itself.
the bible talks about earth being only water and then god making dry land appear.
Entire world used to be covered by water.
Says who?
in 1991 we build a 250 seat hall and had 125 publishers so about 175 in attendance and filing fast.. just spoke to someone from my old congregation they now have 50 to 60 publishers and 100 in attendance on a good day.. very few pioneers.. seems this is happening everywhere.. karter..
We need to reverse shunning policy to promote revival - SBF
'We'?
Why would anybody who knows as much about the WT as you do desire its revival?
diane abbott has often given me moments of amusement throughout the years.. whenever i'm feeling depressed, 30 mins of watching her varied gaffes on youtube usually cheers me up.. the following is a clip from this week (feb 2008) in which she seems to wonder out loud whether mao did more good than harm.
it's great to hear michael portillo's initial reaction ("whaaat!
") and then watch him and andrew neil belly-laugh at diane abbott's comments at the end of the clip.. perhaps she'd been at the blue nun xd.
Abbott and Corbyn were lovers back in the day - what a horrendous mental image that is!
McDonnell is a self-confessed Marxist.
facts we don't want to know.
the purpose of war is to kill humans.. .
which humans?.
China is the most realistic and relevant alternative. Which is scary from a western perspective because they don't seem to share our notions of individualism and freedom. - SBF
China is an enemy of freedom and democracy. Anybody who sees China as a "realistic and relevant alternative" to Western liberal democracy is a useful idiot.
facts we don't want to know.
the purpose of war is to kill humans.. .
which humans?.
The free world should be eternally grateful that the USA carries a big stick.
diane abbott has often given me moments of amusement throughout the years.. whenever i'm feeling depressed, 30 mins of watching her varied gaffes on youtube usually cheers me up.. the following is a clip from this week (feb 2008) in which she seems to wonder out loud whether mao did more good than harm.
it's great to hear michael portillo's initial reaction ("whaaat!
") and then watch him and andrew neil belly-laugh at diane abbott's comments at the end of the clip.. perhaps she'd been at the blue nun xd.
she's had better judgment than those two when it counts
Defending Mao should permanently disqualify her from public office.
She is either a monster or suffering from an astonishing degree of ignorance.
diane abbott has often given me moments of amusement throughout the years.. whenever i'm feeling depressed, 30 mins of watching her varied gaffes on youtube usually cheers me up.. the following is a clip from this week (feb 2008) in which she seems to wonder out loud whether mao did more good than harm.
it's great to hear michael portillo's initial reaction ("whaaat!
") and then watch him and andrew neil belly-laugh at diane abbott's comments at the end of the clip.. perhaps she'd been at the blue nun xd.
Abbott lacks the intelligence, knowledge and judgement that ought to be essential to some degree in any senior politician.
Her comment regarding Mao was outrageous. Her debacle over the costs of additional police officers was hilarious.
She will continue to succeed regardless under the protection of her former lover Corbyn.
so here's the point regarding blood transfusions.
notice jesus asks the pharisees if it was lawful on the sabbath to save a life.
so, can you break god's law to save your life if it came to that?
That's a good question. I would say no he did not, because he fulfilled it - LTPF
So if Jesus didn't break the sabbath law does that not negate your argument in the OP?
so here's the point regarding blood transfusions.
notice jesus asks the pharisees if it was lawful on the sabbath to save a life.
so, can you break god's law to save your life if it came to that?
LTPF - Going back to your OP...
Did Jesus break the sabbath law or not?