SBF - Your arrogance is astonishing.
What is your motive for trying to discredit the authors of the blog?
my intro essay for the new book caused all sorts of off blog controversy.
my writing partner, a retired educator and a witness, responded.
why aren't more witness men like this?
SBF - Your arrogance is astonishing.
What is your motive for trying to discredit the authors of the blog?
i was wondering if there was any policy from the cult about your own blood in you cut your finger and put it in your mouth out of reflex ect.
what if any is the position of this?
i always thought the amount of blood is not the real issue, even a drop would be a sin?.
I don't know if there is anything in writing about this specifically but as a child we were taught not to lick a bleeding wound for this reason.
my intro essay for the new book caused all sorts of off blog controversy.
my writing partner, a retired educator and a witness, responded.
why aren't more witness men like this?
Who are you to tell Vienne what the motivations are of complainants you have never met and whose emails you have never read?
i believe in rational explanations for everything, whether they are understood yet or not.
medication used to be considered 'magic' until understood how it worked.
on the subject of telepathy, for me it's very subtle but has happened many times.
Blatant strawman.
My position about the origin of the cosmos is simple - I don't know.
My position on the supernatural is that it is nothing but a placeholder.
All the burden of proof is with the merchants of woo.
i believe in rational explanations for everything, whether they are understood yet or not.
medication used to be considered 'magic' until understood how it worked.
on the subject of telepathy, for me it's very subtle but has happened many times.
The burden of proof is on those who claim there is a factual basis for 'supernatural' events.
Attempts to uncover objective evidence has so far failed 100% of the time. It is not open-minded to reserve judgement on the supernatural. It is obtuse not to be deeply skeptical.
By the way, the mystery of why there is something rather than nothing is not the topic. The 'something' operates by consistent laws. Admittedly we don't fully understand those laws but that doesn't leave room for woo-woo.
i believe in rational explanations for everything, whether they are understood yet or not.
medication used to be considered 'magic' until understood how it worked.
on the subject of telepathy, for me it's very subtle but has happened many times.
Confirmation bias, selective memory and embellishment after the fact.
Intuition is nothing more than the way our brains subconsciously take short-cuts through data we already have available.
Read 'Unweaving the Rainbow' by Richard Dawkins for a useful treatment of the subject.
in the image you can see what jw wrote about how galileo was treated by the catholic church.
now they are disfelloshipping me because i believe the earth is flat.
is this coherent?.
It does indeed say the earth is flat. Yet another example of why it is silly to organise your life around the ramblings of Iron Age goat herders.
Join us in the 21st century.
in the image you can see what jw wrote about how galileo was treated by the catholic church.
now they are disfelloshipping me because i believe the earth is flat.
is this coherent?.
JWs believe some of the most stupid ideas ever invented but even they have their limits.
You are too gullible even to be a JW.
i had a fair bit of fun giving my first ever post-jw religious sermon.
so i asked rev.
andy if he would like me to deliver another.
Thank you for sharing that. I will watch it later.
IMO it is the subject of 'grace' that separates JWs from the christian faith.
my intro essay for the new book caused all sorts of off blog controversy.
my writing partner, a retired educator and a witness, responded.
why aren't more witness men like this?
That's sexist thinking. It's typical of a certain class of Witness male
It is indeed. The word 'subjection' is central to their ideas about relationships between men and women. In reality they don't just apply it between husband and wife. I wonder if it takes born-in wives some time to get over that indoctrination. Might be a useful thread?