under the radar - I agree.
What is the source please?
That is definitely laying the groundwork to ditch 607 and therefore 1914.
Somehow they are going to focus on the appointment of the FDS since 1919 based on their record over a century.
IMO this is huge.
They deny ever making prophecies about specific dates - John.P
Arguing about 607 has always been a disfellowshipping offense. Now they are pretending they never cared much for it.
our confidence in the Faithful Slave is not dependant on disputable dates
Anybody who has ever suggested that 607 was open to dispute was immediately branded an apostate.
This is like 1975 on acid.