So is this a stupid April's Fool or not?
Posts by cofty
-
79
Preparing the sheeple for finally abandoning the significance of 1914
by under the radar inwe all know the society would love to get rid of all the problems caused by clinging to 1914 and all they claimed it meant for the last 100+ years.. it looks like they are laying the groundwork for easing away from the whole concept of 1914. this would also let them do away with the ridiculous "overlapping generation" bullcrap.
what a diaper load that has been.... anyway, the following is from their super secret marching orders for april, 2019. draw your own conclusions.... "3.
“100 years of faithfulness”: the coordinator of the body of elders, or another elder, should be invited to read the following special announcement.
-
-
519
Tony Morris video footage of him buying a dozen bottles of scotch
by UnshackleTheChains ini was howling watching cedars latest video of tm111 buying a dozen bottles of scotch ((maccallans scotch).
you can't write this stuff.
right, i'm now off to buy a bottle of maccallans 😂..
-
cofty
At 200-400ml per day it won’t last long
Anybody drinking that amount would be an alcoholic and would be doing serious harm to his health.
-
519
Tony Morris video footage of him buying a dozen bottles of scotch
by UnshackleTheChains ini was howling watching cedars latest video of tm111 buying a dozen bottles of scotch ((maccallans scotch).
you can't write this stuff.
right, i'm now off to buy a bottle of maccallans 😂..
-
cofty
I enjoy a single malt and The Macallan is a good choice. I can't begin to imagine buying 12 bottles at once. I often get given a bottle at xmas or birthday and it lasts for weeks or even months. Anybody who can afford to buy a case at a time has a serious amount of disposable income. Unless he was buying for all his GB buddies then he has a drink problem.
-
79
Preparing the sheeple for finally abandoning the significance of 1914
by under the radar inwe all know the society would love to get rid of all the problems caused by clinging to 1914 and all they claimed it meant for the last 100+ years.. it looks like they are laying the groundwork for easing away from the whole concept of 1914. this would also let them do away with the ridiculous "overlapping generation" bullcrap.
what a diaper load that has been.... anyway, the following is from their super secret marching orders for april, 2019. draw your own conclusions.... "3.
“100 years of faithfulness”: the coordinator of the body of elders, or another elder, should be invited to read the following special announcement.
-
cofty
'Faithful Salve' = NOT genuine unless this is a typed up copy.
-
79
Preparing the sheeple for finally abandoning the significance of 1914
by under the radar inwe all know the society would love to get rid of all the problems caused by clinging to 1914 and all they claimed it meant for the last 100+ years.. it looks like they are laying the groundwork for easing away from the whole concept of 1914. this would also let them do away with the ridiculous "overlapping generation" bullcrap.
what a diaper load that has been.... anyway, the following is from their super secret marching orders for april, 2019. draw your own conclusions.... "3.
“100 years of faithfulness”: the coordinator of the body of elders, or another elder, should be invited to read the following special announcement.
-
cofty
under the radar - I agree.
What is the source please?
That is definitely laying the groundwork to ditch 607 and therefore 1914.
Somehow they are going to focus on the appointment of the FDS since 1919 based on their record over a century.
IMO this is huge.
They deny ever making prophecies about specific dates - John.P
Arguing about 607 has always been a disfellowshipping offense. Now they are pretending they never cared much for it.
our confidence in the Faithful Slave is not dependant on disputable dates
Anybody who has ever suggested that 607 was open to dispute was immediately branded an apostate.
This is like 1975 on acid.
-
15
Results of exit polls of elections in Ukraine 2019
by Dmitry inin the second round passes zelensky (~ 30%) after him poroshenko (~ 18%).
https://strana.ua/news/192824-ekzitpol-2019-rezultaty-vyborov-31-marta-tsentr-razumkova-112-sotsis-rejtinh.html.
.
-
cofty
FadetoBlack - 'Whataboutery' is not an answer. I am not from the USA and I have no interest in CNN.
Comparing Putin's Russia to western liberal democracies is wilfully ignorant or dishonest.
-
15
Results of exit polls of elections in Ukraine 2019
by Dmitry inin the second round passes zelensky (~ 30%) after him poroshenko (~ 18%).
https://strana.ua/news/192824-ekzitpol-2019-rezultaty-vyborov-31-marta-tsentr-razumkova-112-sotsis-rejtinh.html.
.
-
cofty
Please don't tell me you are on the #RussiaRussiaRussia team.
I don't understand your question but I believe Russia is a rogue state run by a mobster with the morals of a Fascist megalomaniac.
Not sure if that answers it.
-
15
Results of exit polls of elections in Ukraine 2019
by Dmitry inin the second round passes zelensky (~ 30%) after him poroshenko (~ 18%).
https://strana.ua/news/192824-ekzitpol-2019-rezultaty-vyborov-31-marta-tsentr-razumkova-112-sotsis-rejtinh.html.
.
-
cofty
Dimitry - Do Ukrainians worry about the possibility of Putin annexing the country like he did Crimea?
-
15
Results of exit polls of elections in Ukraine 2019
by Dmitry inin the second round passes zelensky (~ 30%) after him poroshenko (~ 18%).
https://strana.ua/news/192824-ekzitpol-2019-rezultaty-vyborov-31-marta-tsentr-razumkova-112-sotsis-rejtinh.html.
.
-
cofty
Please tell us about them Dimitry. Is one of them more pro-Russia than the other?
-
2
It looks very likely that........
by The Fall Guy in....the end of march will be the end of may!
(she can't last more than a fortnight, can she?).
if you've any spare cash, bet on the uk not leaving the e.u.
-
cofty
A 'soft' Brexit now looks like the most likely outcome.
We could end up with most of the downside of EU membership but without representation.
So many mistakes have been made along the way. Cameron should have fought harder and longer with the EU for concessions on our relationship before calling the referendum. He never imagined he might lose. The possible implications of Brexit ought to have been investigated in advance.
May's decision to call a general election was madness. She should have been consulting with a cross-party group on Brexit throughout but she doesn't know how to collaborate. The outline of a plan — and a set of red lines — ought to have been worked out within Parliament before Article 50 was triggered not 24 hours before the deadline.
She has already agreed to go once stage one of Brexit is complete. Then the real negotiation begins.