The same could be said of those who maintain all species evolved from a single cell and would be just as true.- Earnest
I don't agree Earnest. We were all die-hard creationists once. I was proud of my ability to 'destroy' evolutionists. I knew everything that could be known about creationists arguments.
I would have asserted that I knew about evolution but that was dishonest. My only source of information about evolution was from writers who were rejected evolution. When I actually studied the subject from science books - literally dozens of books over many years - I discovered how ignorant &/or dishonest creationist authors are.
It is not easy to admit one of your foundational beliefs are wrong. The default position is to ignore actual scientific sources and cherry-pick creationist websites and YouTube videos that reinforce your ignorance. And of course they have not a clue how facile the arguments are that so impress them because they don't know the science - through choice.
So no, there is no comparison in intellectual rigour and honesty between creationists who reject evolution, despite admitting never having read a single science book in their entire lives, and exJWs who have done the work and follow the evidence.
One is motivated by fear and dogma, the other by curiosity and a love of learning.
I have posted 40 threads of evidence for evolution, every one of them entirely in my own words based on countless hours of research and backed up by peer-reviewed papers. Creationists ignore them, post copy-paste and YouTube videos and pretend they are engaging in honest debate.
Debating a creationist is like accepting a challenge against a bull in a china shop. He gets ten minutes to rampage and then you get ten minutes to put it all back together again.