It's not about changing the definitions of words. That is trivial.
It's about the denial of objective realities.
Postmodernism is a disease.
yeah, so the candace owens show is apparently in london and douglas murray is the person interviewed.. they cover a range of topics that are current and connected to murray's new book (the madness of crowds: gender, race and identity).. i've not got his new book but it seems to be good.
owens and murray both make good points and it's a joy to listen to them together.. enjoy .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4o9yqrby9q.
It's not about changing the definitions of words. That is trivial.
It's about the denial of objective realities.
Postmodernism is a disease.
yeah, so the candace owens show is apparently in london and douglas murray is the person interviewed.. they cover a range of topics that are current and connected to murray's new book (the madness of crowds: gender, race and identity).. i've not got his new book but it seems to be good.
owens and murray both make good points and it's a joy to listen to them together.. enjoy .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4o9yqrby9q.
I do think that postmodern instability in gender relations and other kinds of deconstruction are a result of the material conditions of late capitalism. - SBF
How so?
The most active proponents of identity politics are not victims of capitalism, they are over-privileged beneficiaries of it.
yeah, so the candace owens show is apparently in london and douglas murray is the person interviewed.. they cover a range of topics that are current and connected to murray's new book (the madness of crowds: gender, race and identity).. i've not got his new book but it seems to be good.
owens and murray both make good points and it's a joy to listen to them together.. enjoy .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4o9yqrby9q.
PP - You are so far off the mark. That was a very disingenuous summary.
yeah, so the candace owens show is apparently in london and douglas murray is the person interviewed.. they cover a range of topics that are current and connected to murray's new book (the madness of crowds: gender, race and identity).. i've not got his new book but it seems to be good.
owens and murray both make good points and it's a joy to listen to them together.. enjoy .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4o9yqrby9q.
Really excellent conversation between two intelligent and intellectually honest people.
I look forward to reading Douglas Murray's new book The Madness of Crowds.
One of the key points that came out of the the conversation was the critique of the belief in the 'perfectibility' of humans and of society. This is the foundational error that lay behind communism and every other crazy utopian ideology including the Watchtower. It is a main theme of Pinker's The Blank Slate. If you haven't read it yet do yourself a favour.
yeah, so the candace owens show is apparently in london and douglas murray is the person interviewed.. they cover a range of topics that are current and connected to murray's new book (the madness of crowds: gender, race and identity).. i've not got his new book but it seems to be good.
owens and murray both make good points and it's a joy to listen to them together.. enjoy .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4o9yqrby9q.
Thanks. Two of my favourite minds having a chat. Will have a listen later.
i have looked through all my bookmarks but i just can't seem to find it.
a while back i came across a site that discusses the blood topic.
does anyone know what link would get me there?.
Have a look at these threads too.
The Watchtower are Right About Blood...
My Explanation of Why They Got it Wrong About Blood Using Only the NWT
just wondering hate to give the devil his due.
In the early days Russell advised those who subscribed to his writings to stay in whatever church they were currently associated with. He said that no organisation had monopoly on truth and that Christ would know his sheep wherever they were to be found.
Those are not the actions of a man who was seeking to set himself up as a leader. If only he had stuck to those principles.
just wondering hate to give the devil his due.
To be honest it was so long ago since I read Russell's books I would be struggling to remember the source.
To paraphrase he said something along the lines of - if somebody had only the bible, they would be walking in darkness, but if they had ONLY Studies in Scripture then in ten years time they would still be in the light.
just wondering hate to give the devil his due.
But overall, compared with many other sectarian leaders, it seems that he was a good person with good intentuons - SBF
I broadly agree agree with that but I'm not sure it was still true towards the end of his life. His statement that elevated the utility of Studies in the Scriptures above scripture suggests extreme hubris.
wonderfully warm interview from "stop the shunning" channel host beth, with ex mormon morgan ( ex morgan).. morgan describes her young life and the process of waking up or, in mormon parlance, her "shelf breaking".
there really are so many things we have in common, from young marriage to feeling personally responsible for saving everyone you have contact with that's not of your religion.
morgan also describes both her father, her husband and her own fear of losing family and loved ones at the same time as loosing her religion and difficulty we all have whilst pretending we still believe or being pimo.. highly recommended viewing.https://youtu.be/upxirjvtpec .
Thanks for posting. I enjoy learning about 'apostates' of all sorts of groups.
Jenna Miscavige's story is worth a read too. So many similarities.