i have a very good friend who has been banned from facebook simply because he makes remarks positive about president trump and negative toward the democratic party.
he has tried to get back on facebook and it appears there is no way for him to return.
people are being removed from social media platforms simply because they have a different political view.
The losing side always blame the media for their own failures. It happened with Indy Ref and with Brexit. It's similar to the way losing football managers always think the referee had a bad day.
Having said that, it is now beyond all doubt that the print media, the movie industry, TV and social media have a strong left-wing bias.
Facebook continue to deny responsibility by claiming that they are only a platform. That is not sustainable if they continue to make these editorial decisions.
prince harry and meghan markle, the duke and duchess of sussex, have stepped back from royal duties and moved to an exclusive enclave of california and into a £11 million mansion (i guess they're slumming it, lol).
they have recently made several pod casts, featuring themselves pontificating on a range of subjects - blm, 'structural racism', the environment, etc.. while they're free to make whatever content they wish, it does seem ridiculous.. why should i treat harry or meghan seriously?.
take meghan.
Harry used to be a great bloke but he was without purpose in his life. The media made his army career impossible. He is the spare to his older brother and now they have children he will never be king.
Meghan has given him a new direction in life. I believe he is totally sincere but has no self-awareness regarding how vacuous he sounds. I wish him well but I wish he would shut up now.
The Queen has handled it with her usual grace. The monarchy might look like an anachronism to outsiders but it plays a vital role in national unity. We can rage against our political leaders while uniting behind the monarch.
America told George III where to go - don't blame them for that - but now they are stuck with two tribes who can only scream obscenities at each other.
this will never work but liberals are too stupid to know it.
first off all you have to do is cross the border and buy a car.
if they will not let you license it in the state then many will license it out of state.
SBF you appear to be alarmist by nature.
the following is from: cosmos, chaos and the world to come (pp.
222-224), norman cohn.
yale university press.
OThank you Phizzy. This is fascinating.
Christianity is derived from an apocalyptic sect of Judaism. If I understand Doug correctly - and Phizzys post - dualism was a product of the Exile. Did the concept of a Messiah even exist pre-Exile, other than in the sense of anointing a king? The belief in a saviour and in an end-time showdown between good and evil seems alien to the OT before the influence of Zoroastrianism.
Sorry Doug I have been slow on the uptake.
ETA - I hope I haven't broken forum guidelines by failing to mention Trump I'm this post.
if you accuse people of being stuck in jw mindset or "cult-like" mentality simply because someone has a different view of politics than you, you'll be deleted.. it's insulting and a lazy substitute for having any real argument for a proper debate.. what next ... "you smell" ?.
Wow that takes me back JP!
I liked New Chapter. She was a formidable debator.
they have predicted this for years.
religions of the world would become attacked by the governments.
the only difference is when they go after jehovah’s witnesses, then jehovah god will step in and destroy the governments..
coffy IMO there are no good Muslims - Mickbobcat
You are a fascist. You approve of millions of innocents being locked up in concentration camps. I can't decide whether you are morally deficient or just astonishingly ignorant.
Either way my life is less enjoyable for interacting with you. I hope one day you either grow up or educate yourself.
they have predicted this for years.
religions of the world would become attacked by the governments.
the only difference is when they go after jehovah’s witnesses, then jehovah god will step in and destroy the governments..
Mickbobcat if you support the Chinese government sending millions of Uighur Muslims to concentration camps then you are literally a fascist.
Shame on you. Go read a history book and learn about how tyranny starts and where it ends.
in a disgusting new video, anthony morris iii talks about apostates, and brings to mind his 'hot dog' talk all over again as he anticipates the demise of ex-jehovah's witnesses.
i don't know if you're familiar with maggots, but when you see a whole bunch of them it's not a pleasant sight.. .
what a fitting picture of the final end of all of god's enemies.
It is a sure sign of insecurity. They know they are facing an existential crisis and they need someone to blame. The passionate hatred is disconcerting.
the following is from: cosmos, chaos and the world to come (pp.
222-224), norman cohn.
yale university press.
The "Judaism" of the "Old Testament" is not the Judaism of Jesus and his contemporaries
This is such an important insight. We tend to compress history. It's similar to the way we in the UK talk about the 'Roman period' in Britain, as if the Romans of the 5th century dressed, talked and worshipped the same way as their forebears who arrived in 43 AD.
The Zoroastrian influence on Judaism is fascinating.
By extension, the apocalyptic worldview of JWs - and Evangelical Christianity - finds its roots in Persia.
the famous double-slit experiment proves that light travels both in individual particles called photons and also as a mathematical probability wave.
matter itself exhibits this particle-wave duality which allows objects to exist in two different places at the same time, depending on whether of not you are looking (testing) at it.
scientists have recently been able to get molecules as large as 2000 atoms to exhibit this duality!.
Sea Breeze - I don't want to distract from TD's point but I also don't want to avoid your direct question.
Briefly - it is impossible to deny the remote possibility that life on earth was seeded from outside our planet. However I think it is the least likely answer to the origin of life question - second only to 'god-did-it.
Now please carry on engaging with TD who has pinpointed the fundamental flaw in the argument from 'information'.
