Thankfully they got it right here, and because of this people still have a right to defend themselves.
And herein lies the crux for many. This is where this argument started over a year ago. You think if this loser is found to be guilty in any way, it somehow diminishes your precious right to carry a gun. At least some can seperate this travesty from the right to bear arms.
Wrong. Otherwise you must be agreeing juries always get it right. Sheriff Lawrence Rainey must have been totally innocent too.
OMG, EP were you looking over my shoulder??? I was about to post a pic of LR.
6 Women jurors.
Hummingbird
But don't let facts cloud your biases now.
Back atcha Simon
5go - GZ had every right to walk his neighborhood. The first illegal act was when TM punched GZ ti the ground.
And yet it is only GZs word that tells us this. The actual evidence has zero DNA on TM, or bruises or skin under fingernails etc.
Try to shake out 15 months of media spin demonising GZ and painting TM as an innocent 12 year old kid buying sweeties before you answer.
Funny, I didn't see that. I did see a lot of demonising a dead boy though.
Do you think OJ was innocent and MJ was a good babysitter too ...
What an odd thing to say
Total injustice. in my opinion
Trayvon was a teenager who acted the best he could from someone who he perceived to be dangerous and threating.
After it was realized by Trayvon that Zimmerman was not backing off from the first verbal interaction, that this guy was going to be a real
threat to him, he went into his own act of protecting himself.
This altercation was a typical fist fight, Trayvon didn't not have a weapon so to assert that Zimmerman had to use the gun
to protect his life is way over the insinuation to the known facts.
Incredilbly sad. Faith in humanity taking a huge hit right now.
just when i was thinking i don't like ted talks, this is an excellent take on job creation and wealth distribution.
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckcvf8e7v1g.
I read that demand for goods or services creates jobs. NOT demands from people looking for work creates jobs.Trying to say that people LOOKING for work creates jobs is just plain silly.
Of course.
Demand does not equal jobs in an age when most things are made with little ( or less and less ) human intervention every day.
Conversely, without demand all that automation and human intervention, as little as it may be, will be useless.
Productivity is up largely because of the increased automation in almost every sector.
Not neccessarily. Human productivity is up, but wages are stagnant or even down. Downsizing, fewer unions, off shoring, longer hours, fewer people being made to do the same or more work etc etc etc.
This is what years of buying into the supply side economics myth has done for us. Even China is beginning to look at raising wages to create consumers.
Couple of interesting articles.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=au7tdjzgHks8
