i'm working on some statistical analysis of child abuse data made public by the royal commission.
while i'm working on this, can someone here do me a favor and look up the peak publisher figures reported by watchtower for the australian branch for each of the years from 2005 through 2014?
my thanks in advance.
What rules did you use in cases where the victim count is unstated or shown as a minimum value?
From the thread referenced:
'10+' could mean any number 10 and above, and 'Unclear' could mean any number 1 and above.
These were not being counted in the total.
I replaced all the '10+' with the number 10, and all the 'Unclear' with the number 1...
The total number of victims on this list is 1857.
This means the ratio is 1857 victims / 1006 abusers = 1.85/1 ratio
i'm working on some statistical analysis of child abuse data made public by the royal commission.
while i'm working on this, can someone here do me a favor and look up the peak publisher figures reported by watchtower for the australian branch for each of the years from 2005 through 2014?
my thanks in advance.
In the 1006 thread I calculated the ratio (conservatively) to be 1.85 victims per abuser.
So with 28,827 known abusers, using the ratio of 1.85 victims per 1 abuser, this suggests there have been 53,330 child abuse victims in the 10 year period 2005-2014.
Those children could fill a convention stadium!
it seems they do have a database!
!you can view it here on the royal commission website:.
http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
@Oubliette
I did a bit of work on fastJehu's spreadsheet...
'10+' could mean any number 10 and above, and 'Unclear' could mean any number 1 and above.
These were not being counted in the total.
I replaced all the '10+' with the number 10, and all the 'Unclear' with the number 1...
The total number of victims on this list is 1857.
This means the ratio is 1857 victims / 1006 abusers = 1.85/1 ratio
https://www.reddit.com/domain/childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/.compact.
i pressed all the wrong buttons.
here it is, posted about an hour ago..
Thanks fastjehu
'10+' could mean any number 10 and above, and 'Unclear' could mean any number 1 and above.
These were not being counted in the total.
I replaced all the '10+' with the number 10, and all the 'Unclear' with the number 1...
The total number of victims on this list is 1857.
it seems they do have a database!
!you can view it here on the royal commission website:.
http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
There's already a thread for this:
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/422200001/huge-list-victims
it seems they do have a database!
!you can view it here on the royal commission website:.
http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
breakfast of champions2 minutes ago
Question:
Is this the actual list produced by watchtower? ie, do we know this is not an interpretation or summary of evidence provided by watchtower, but their very own original document?
It's on the Royal Commission website, tendered by Angus Stewart. It's as official as it could possibly be.
it seems they do have a database!
!you can view it here on the royal commission website:.
http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
You can view it here on the Royal Commission website:
| Exhibit Number | Hearing Day | Tendered By | Witness Names | Date Tendered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29-0031 | Day 153 | Angus Stewart SC | NA | 05-Aug-15 |
The link to the actual file:
Same link with a URL shortener:
I see that there are 1,730 alleged victims noted!!
I don't know if that total includes the ones that say '10+' or 'Unclear' as these are not proper numbers that would be added by a SUM() function.
hello again.. splash had a pile of scriptural evidence which he uploaded and it was good material.
it established the gb as the fds and used watchtower study articles.........i don't know if he was the only one but the material flew in the face of what those men have been saying.
it proves, using their own material how they indeed think they are the ones with the direct control over millions of lives, because as you know.........they are the direct hot line to god.
Some recent articles that could be useful:
http://www.jw.org/en/publications/magazines/w20130415/do-not-tire-out/
(this one contains the organisation structure pictures)
http://www.jw.org/en/publications/magazines/w20130415/make-sure-of-the-more-important-things/
http://www.jw.org/en/publications/magazines/w20130715/who-is-faithful-discreet-slave/
http://www.jw.org/en/publications/magazines/w20131115/obey-jehovahs-shepherds/
http://www.jw.org/en/publications/magazines/w20140515/moving-ahead-jehovahs-organization/
http://www.jw.org/en/publications/magazines/w20140515/jehovah-god-organization/
And this one relating to disfellowshipping:
http://www.jw.org/en/publications/magazines/w20150415/disfellowshipping-a-loving-provision/
hello again.. splash had a pile of scriptural evidence which he uploaded and it was good material.
it established the gb as the fds and used watchtower study articles.........i don't know if he was the only one but the material flew in the face of what those men have been saying.
it proves, using their own material how they indeed think they are the ones with the direct control over millions of lives, because as you know.........they are the direct hot line to god.
hello again.. splash had a pile of scriptural evidence which he uploaded and it was good material.
it established the gb as the fds and used watchtower study articles.........i don't know if he was the only one but the material flew in the face of what those men have been saying.
it proves, using their own material how they indeed think they are the ones with the direct control over millions of lives, because as you know.........they are the direct hot line to god.
