Wait . . . Lyl, hold on . . .
Boston . . . ?
Are you Rick's wife?
i must say publishingcult spent a lot of time producing this video about the six screens march 12, 2011 conference call.
the call lasted approximately five hours and many people called in and we discussed a number of topics.
for reasons we will not bring up,the nude picture that appeared in the 1927 watchtower publication "creation" and which we brought up on this conference call deeply disturbed puplishingcult.
Wait . . . Lyl, hold on . . .
Boston . . . ?
Are you Rick's wife?
i must say publishingcult spent a lot of time producing this video about the six screens march 12, 2011 conference call.
the call lasted approximately five hours and many people called in and we discussed a number of topics.
for reasons we will not bring up,the nude picture that appeared in the 1927 watchtower publication "creation" and which we brought up on this conference call deeply disturbed puplishingcult.
Or maybe some people chose to address it in private instead of on a conference call.
Disagreement was expressed both publicly and privately with Mr. Fearon before the conference call. He did not respond. He proceeded unheeded.
I really do not wish to sound insulting to you, for you have already taken exception to something that apparently has no direct reflection on you, however, yes, and I say this with much sarchasm and distaste at this point: Yes, in a public call-in show, to disagree with bigotry and wild speculation and to call it what it is would be utterly rediculous. It's much better to whimper in private. Seriously?
If it were the case, and that was their choice, and of course it was their choice, they are cowards.
OK, I am finished discussing this.
I will, however, say that unlike Mr. Fearon, I do not ring-and-run. I was here to discuss these videos and the content and provide valid arguments for them. Where is Rick? Where are the sycophant callers to defend their position?
Enough said.
i must say publishingcult spent a lot of time producing this video about the six screens march 12, 2011 conference call.
the call lasted approximately five hours and many people called in and we discussed a number of topics.
for reasons we will not bring up,the nude picture that appeared in the 1927 watchtower publication "creation" and which we brought up on this conference call deeply disturbed puplishingcult.
Maybe not everyone joined in the conversation because they did not agree with the statements being made.
and neither did they speak up to say they disagreed.
“Of course we must fear evil men, but there is another evil that we must fear more . . . and that is the indifference of good men.”
-Troy Duffy
i must say publishingcult spent a lot of time producing this video about the six screens march 12, 2011 conference call.
the call lasted approximately five hours and many people called in and we discussed a number of topics.
for reasons we will not bring up,the nude picture that appeared in the 1927 watchtower publication "creation" and which we brought up on this conference call deeply disturbed puplishingcult.
Something, too, I want to restate: Rick read not only all the commentes posted to his original plug for the conference call, but I also sent him an email on youtube expressing my concern after he failed to respond to any of the other posters on his own thread, to which he also did not respond. What does that tell you? He knew better, or at least had a clue that what he was doing was not so good for himself and would go against what he claims his goal is.
WTBTS COINTELPRO
Something stinks about him.
i must say publishingcult spent a lot of time producing this video about the six screens march 12, 2011 conference call.
the call lasted approximately five hours and many people called in and we discussed a number of topics.
for reasons we will not bring up,the nude picture that appeared in the 1927 watchtower publication "creation" and which we brought up on this conference call deeply disturbed puplishingcult.
Lyl, let me try one last time to make this clear.
Rick asserted the image in the Creation book, and we have it well-documented, was lude, perverted, blasphemous and of a homosexual nature. He emphatically asserted these things as fact. He lied, perhaps out of ignorance, but as they say, "ignorance is no excuse". Rick is responsible for the content of his program and he gets nailed and criticized for being a bigot and a sensationalist. Fair game.
The callers I "featured" in part I were agreeing and asserting the same thing. I can just hear Thomas Newton getting the spectators in the Court of Oyer and Terminer all worked up during the Salem witch trials, and everyone pointing their fanatical fingers at whoever they suspect of being in league with Satan. Rational people, like you of course, get a pass and they don't get played in this instance because we are pointing out the lunacy that was this topic. Therefore, my calling them "the cast of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" was for them and them only. Fair game. Those listening on the line who didn't jump on the polite version of the God Hates Fags bandwagon and who remained silent are probably glad they did.
It is the cross that is the most telling feature, in the shape of a capital T, as the crosses used by Romans for crucifixion were. "It is a Christian crucifixion taking place outside the city walls," says Mr Davies.
Boy, how is the WTBTS going to explain this one to the rank and file?
i got an email back with a reply from youtube about our discussion on the other thread.
they enclosed these conduct rules with the bolded areas that may apply to your videos.
youtube says that posters of videos need to get consent from third parties regarding material they post.
Rick was the one who brought it up, not the others. They should not of been targeted. I will be on the call in the future, and will protect my rights like youtube told me. But make no mistake, when I make comments, I defend them 100%. I know what I stand for and do not back down. If you ever have a problem with anything you hear me say on the conference calls, I invite you to open a thread here and we will discuss it. That way you don't have to hide behind a video.
I am Lilly from Boston MA, just remember my name. Peace, Lilly
Lily, if you go on the show and speak, you are not protected under law, sorry, but you are not. You can demand all you want that I or somebody else not use your comments in a video, but there is nothing you can do, except decide not to speak publicly on a recorded program for public consumption. You cannot put your sh@t out there then cry foul when it's criticized. We've been over this.
The audience was fair game because they were all acting like sycophants and sputtering irrationalities. In the context of the subject matter and its irrationality, it was appropriate that they be heard.
I'm Janos from San Diego, and make no mistake, when I make comments, I defend them 100%. I know what I stand for and do not back down, either. So, you're suggesting that instead of hiding behind a video, I just come here to hide behind my computer instead? Good thinking! Let's do that!
i must say publishingcult spent a lot of time producing this video about the six screens march 12, 2011 conference call.
the call lasted approximately five hours and many people called in and we discussed a number of topics.
for reasons we will not bring up,the nude picture that appeared in the 1927 watchtower publication "creation" and which we brought up on this conference call deeply disturbed puplishingcult.
Seriously Mr. PC have you ever heard of Constructive Criticism? The bitter venom you spitted makes you no better than the person you were attacking. You spent a better portion on the vids labeling and name calling.
Are YOU serious? Rick and those calling in were so utterly constructive and lacking venom, no speculation, no bigotry, no hatred whatsoever. You are right, and I am now so ashamed.
They're are way more videos out there by Ex-JWs and associates that are far more appalling and over the top than Rick's Conference calls. You can't single him out.
Care to share one or two of these apalling over the top apostate videos . . . ?
@cyberjesus; I was waiting for someone to point that out. Which one was she do you suppose? The "illuminati/young healthy men at Bethel" lady?
i got an email back with a reply from youtube about our discussion on the other thread.
they enclosed these conduct rules with the bolded areas that may apply to your videos.
youtube says that posters of videos need to get consent from third parties regarding material they post.
Look, Lyl, those who go on these kinds of programs think they can just run their mouths and say whatever they want, and they can. FREE SPEECH. But then I get to listen to it, then express my opinions about what they say. And here you are, freely expressing your opinions about what I had to say about what they had to say. If they are going to say irrational and bigoted statements, they should expect to have a mirror held up to their faces (so to speak). If they cannot handle the criticism, they probably shouldn't open their mouths.
i just want to be clear on this.
some have attributed my motives for denouncing homophobia and bigotry to my being gay.
some have come to the conclusion that i must be gay for shouting down the homophobes and bigots on this board.
let me get this straight because perhaps I've missed something around here. Did you get all bent out of shape because people use the term"That's so Gay"? If you did, why not lighten up?
No, of course not. That would be a bit petty. I think I was pretty clear in my first post above :)
Hey gay boy, come on down here to southern Mississippi and some of my kinfolk will make you think you are in the Deliverance II movie being filmed.
LOL, really? Are you going to make us watch you have sex with your cousin or something? :)