C0ntr013r
JoinedPosts by C0ntr013r
-
128
Participate In The EX-JW Personality Test!
by C0ntr013r infirst of all; i must admit that i'm not a huge fan of putting people in boxes like this, it is not an exact science.
but i still think the data can be quite interesting and i intend to collect it and share it in a structured way with you guys.
so without future ado here are the details.. link to test: .
-
128
Participate In The EX-JW Personality Test!
by C0ntr013r infirst of all; i must admit that i'm not a huge fan of putting people in boxes like this, it is not an exact science.
but i still think the data can be quite interesting and i intend to collect it and share it in a structured way with you guys.
so without future ado here are the details.. link to test: .
-
128
Participate In The EX-JW Personality Test!
by C0ntr013r infirst of all; i must admit that i'm not a huge fan of putting people in boxes like this, it is not an exact science.
but i still think the data can be quite interesting and i intend to collect it and share it in a structured way with you guys.
so without future ado here are the details.. link to test: .
-
C0ntr013r
Based on 56 submissions.
In this graph I have taken the personality type frequency into consideration.
When doing this, all the types should get roughly the same percentage since that would reflect the distribution in society (rare types should be few and common types should be many).
-
128
Participate In The EX-JW Personality Test!
by C0ntr013r infirst of all; i must admit that i'm not a huge fan of putting people in boxes like this, it is not an exact science.
but i still think the data can be quite interesting and i intend to collect it and share it in a structured way with you guys.
so without future ado here are the details.. link to test: .
-
C0ntr013r
Better detail?
-
128
Participate In The EX-JW Personality Test!
by C0ntr013r infirst of all; i must admit that i'm not a huge fan of putting people in boxes like this, it is not an exact science.
but i still think the data can be quite interesting and i intend to collect it and share it in a structured way with you guys.
so without future ado here are the details.. link to test: .
-
C0ntr013r
Here is the personality distribution based on 56 submissions.
-
128
Participate In The EX-JW Personality Test!
by C0ntr013r infirst of all; i must admit that i'm not a huge fan of putting people in boxes like this, it is not an exact science.
but i still think the data can be quite interesting and i intend to collect it and share it in a structured way with you guys.
so without future ado here are the details.. link to test: .
-
C0ntr013r
This last week has kept me very busy and I apologize for keeping you waiting.
I also had to recollect all your data because of a corrupt save file...
There has been some confusion about what types people are and I want to clear some points up that might help you figure out which type you actually are.
Extrovert:
Gains energy from being social.
Introvert:
Being social drains energy and you need to recharge your batteries by being alone.
When it comes to the N/S, T/F. One of them will be your dominant function and it can be either introverted or extroverted.
Introverted N:
Ni: Interested in the big picture, connect existing ideas, seeking patterns, simplifying the idea to its core.
Extroverted N:
Ne: Creativity driven, new ideas, adds info to idea, "scatter-brained", bored by routine. See many ideas and possibilities.
Introverted S:
Si: Lives in the past, detail-oriented, security seeking, follows rules, goes by the book.
Extroverted S:
Se: Lives in the present, hands on, show off, experience-seeking, thinks on ones feet.
Introverted T:
Ti: Thinks internally, non confrontational, inductive logic, organizing ideas, detached. Deep thinking about all angels of an idea.
Extroverted T:
Te: Thinks out loud, pragmatic, confrontational, needs objective proof, deductive logic.
Introverted F:
Fi: Conceals emotions, values identity, in touch with own feelings (over others).
Extroverted F:
Fe: Expressive, sensitive to criticism, values harmony, lives according to norms.
If you are unsure which one you are you can find out by thinking about if you have extroverted or introverted thinking/feeling/intuition/sensing.
If your primary function is extroverted your secondary function is introverted and vice versa.
And remember everyone does have all of it but the test is trying to figure out which one is most dominant among the different traits.
Judging:
Closure, Decision, Scheduled, Organized, Plan, Control, Now.
Perceiving:
Openness, Options, Spontaneous, Disorganized, Experience, Flexible, Later.
The picture is a bit bad:
Yellow: Sensing
Blue: Thinking
Green: Intuition
Red: Feeling
Introverted functions on the left and extroverted on the right of the line in the middle of the different types.
Dominant function at the top, weakest function at the bottom.
Link to higher resolution:
http://www.celebritytypes.com/misc_pictures/all_types_cognitive_functions.png
Assertive:
Self assured, even tempered, resistant to stress, refuse to worry to much, don't push themselves to hard.
Turbulent:
Self-conscious, sensitive to stress, wide range of emotions, success driven, perfectionists, eager to improve.
-
128
Participate In The EX-JW Personality Test!
by C0ntr013r infirst of all; i must admit that i'm not a huge fan of putting people in boxes like this, it is not an exact science.
but i still think the data can be quite interesting and i intend to collect it and share it in a structured way with you guys.
so without future ado here are the details.. link to test: .
-
C0ntr013r
I will be making more charts with all this new data when I get home from work, keep them coming!
If you have any suggestions on a particular chart you would like to see, let me know ;)
-
128
Participate In The EX-JW Personality Test!
by C0ntr013r infirst of all; i must admit that i'm not a huge fan of putting people in boxes like this, it is not an exact science.
but i still think the data can be quite interesting and i intend to collect it and share it in a structured way with you guys.
so without future ado here are the details.. link to test: .
-
C0ntr013r
If you have different results from two different tests, please tell me which one fits you best. And I will use that one in my calculations :) -
128
Participate In The EX-JW Personality Test!
by C0ntr013r infirst of all; i must admit that i'm not a huge fan of putting people in boxes like this, it is not an exact science.
but i still think the data can be quite interesting and i intend to collect it and share it in a structured way with you guys.
so without future ado here are the details.. link to test: .
-
C0ntr013r
Controller - your charts are really meaningless without normalizing based on the general population. You're surprised at how even the distribution has been, but that in itself is significant since, for example, INTJs are less than 1%of the population. The fact that INTJs are about as common here as other personalities either means that they're MUCH more likely to wake up, or that they're much more likely to talk about it online, or some combination thereof (I'm in the "combination of the two" camp).
The chart I think you are reffering to was showing how common the different letters where, E VS I, N VS S, etc.
In my last comparison between the different types, I took how common they are into consideration. And I made the point you just made. -
128
Participate In The EX-JW Personality Test!
by C0ntr013r infirst of all; i must admit that i'm not a huge fan of putting people in boxes like this, it is not an exact science.
but i still think the data can be quite interesting and i intend to collect it and share it in a structured way with you guys.
so without future ado here are the details.. link to test: .
-
C0ntr013r
Interesting, I think the one I linked is the biggest one but there might be a better version. What site did you use? Some of us might want to take that test and see if we get the same results.