Sab, straight question.... Are you high right now? I'm NOT judging or giving you shit, I really am curious. You're kinda writing in riddles and I'm not sure what to make of it. Maybe I haven't been paying attention on JWN since I came back.
EDIT: One of my favorite geeks was Carl Sagan, notorious pothead. So, again, that wasn't meant to be an insult.
Book of Mormon critics attempting to use DNA "have not given us anything that would pass the muster of peer review by scientists in this field, because they have ignored the real complexity of the issues involved. Further, they have overlooked the entire concept of hypothesis testing in science and believe that just because they label their results as "based on DNA," they have somehow proved that the results are accurate or that they have designed the experiment correctly. At best, they have demonstrated that the global colonization hypothesis is an oversimplified interpretation of the Book of Mormon. At worst, they have misrepresented themselves and the evidence in the pursuit of other agendas."
How is this any different from WTBTS "scholars" trying to cast doubt on the work of archaeologists, scholars, and historians in an effort to promote their 607BCE chronology?