NDrew, I am Jesus Christ. I've been trying to contact you for a while now.
SweetBabyCheezits
JoinedPosts by SweetBabyCheezits
-
111
Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
by SweetBabyCheezits ini am blatantly plagiarizing this from a 20th century email that claimed this was an open letter to laura schlessinger.
snopes has the real scoop on it's origins.
i'm sure it's been posted on jwn more than once in years past.
-
-
-
111
Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
by SweetBabyCheezits ini am blatantly plagiarizing this from a 20th century email that claimed this was an open letter to laura schlessinger.
snopes has the real scoop on it's origins.
i'm sure it's been posted on jwn more than once in years past.
-
-
SweetBabyCheezits
Do you consider your beliefs to be fodder?
Yes!
Fodder: A consumable, often inferior item or resource that is in demand and usually abundant supply.
-
111
Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
by SweetBabyCheezits ini am blatantly plagiarizing this from a 20th century email that claimed this was an open letter to laura schlessinger.
snopes has the real scoop on it's origins.
i'm sure it's been posted on jwn more than once in years past.
-
-
SweetBabyCheezits
Chariklo, I would love to take credit for that fine piece of writing... so I will. (Nod to Zoiks. Again.)
Kidding. None of the OP is my own, aside from very minor changes to address it to Perry. I copied the content from a well-circulated email, which I also thought was brilliantly written.
-
111
Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
by SweetBabyCheezits ini am blatantly plagiarizing this from a 20th century email that claimed this was an open letter to laura schlessinger.
snopes has the real scoop on it's origins.
i'm sure it's been posted on jwn more than once in years past.
-
-
SweetBabyCheezits
Me: Look, you're free to not answer the question.
You: I choose "(your) free to not answer".
Well, maybe you can answer why you deliberately changed the correct use of the contraction, you're, to the possessive pronoun, your?
Free does not belong to me.
I assumed you ask believers what they believe so that you might have fodder to ridicule.
Do you consider your beliefs to be fodder?
-
111
Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
by SweetBabyCheezits ini am blatantly plagiarizing this from a 20th century email that claimed this was an open letter to laura schlessinger.
snopes has the real scoop on it's origins.
i'm sure it's been posted on jwn more than once in years past.
-
-
SweetBabyCheezits
Yeah, well, friends call me Pushy McBossypants for a reason.
Look, you're free to not answer the question. But being evasive just makes it appear that you...
- don't know what you believe.
OR
- lied when you said you don't reject certain scriptures.
-
102
Got my Privileges Removed today, any advice?
by mrbunyrabit insooo i was a ministerial servant (omg a ministerial servant on this site!?
you apostate!!!
) yea yea i just wanted to see what other people think and whatever, coz i had a few questions myself, (butttt its not like i was about to start throwing them with rocks and stuff, they arent that bad).
-
-
SweetBabyCheezits
That's a good idea. No shame in being Joe Publisher while you sort things out. Next stop: www.jwfacts.com
-
111
Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
by SweetBabyCheezits ini am blatantly plagiarizing this from a 20th century email that claimed this was an open letter to laura schlessinger.
snopes has the real scoop on it's origins.
i'm sure it's been posted on jwn more than once in years past.
-
-
SweetBabyCheezits
I think you're being intentionallyobtuse in this case because you don't want to answer the question. The last person I saw being so evasive was a JW. Prior to that, a politician.
Forget about StillThinking. SweetBabyCheezits want to know if you disagree with any scriptures in the Bible canon. Are you afraid? Are you unsure? Talk to me Nance.
-
111
Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
by SweetBabyCheezits ini am blatantly plagiarizing this from a 20th century email that claimed this was an open letter to laura schlessinger.
snopes has the real scoop on it's origins.
i'm sure it's been posted on jwn more than once in years past.
-
-
SweetBabyCheezits
I won't answer any questions generated BY HER and she knows it.
That's fine. I'm asking the question, not her. And you are evading.
But thanks for referring to me as having a tripod. I joke about it being a third leg...
-
102
Got my Privileges Removed today, any advice?
by mrbunyrabit insooo i was a ministerial servant (omg a ministerial servant on this site!?
you apostate!!!
) yea yea i just wanted to see what other people think and whatever, coz i had a few questions myself, (butttt its not like i was about to start throwing them with rocks and stuff, they arent that bad).
-
-
SweetBabyCheezits
I'm pretty sure that if there was a chimp who could go to a door and hand out magazines and go do this for at least 10 hours a month, he would be made a MS in no time.
Well I see you've read my bio.
-
111
Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
by SweetBabyCheezits ini am blatantly plagiarizing this from a 20th century email that claimed this was an open letter to laura schlessinger.
snopes has the real scoop on it's origins.
i'm sure it's been posted on jwn more than once in years past.
-
-
SweetBabyCheezits
Great analogy, Gladiator. Hope all's well with ye, young squire!
It's not hijacking if the thread originator asks for your input, Nancy. And there is a "good reason" for you to answer - so you can back up your accusation that StillThinking was lying in this thread...
StillThinking: ....they [scriptures] are discarded like trash if they don't say what you want them to.
NDrew: This is a lie
So how do you regard the verses cited in the OP, Nance? Do you abide by those verses or discard them as irrelevant? This concept you have of god - does he change over time? Or stay the same?