ok, he knows the deal. He is quoted in this article as well (dated Jan 2002):
http://www.spokesmanreview.com/news-story.asp?date=012702&ID=s1092770&cat=section.Religion
more about him (esp his work):
http://www.contendingforthefaith.com/summary/experts/stark.html
I don't know what to think. My gut reaction is that Stark made a comment that the witnesses took as support for them, perhaps in that article in the Spokesman Review. The Witnesses NEVER annotate their sources, which to me is really amazing for all the nonsense that is put out there about other people quoting their publications. Who know what he said, and in what context. If he was making a comment in a social science context, he could have been making a nuetral comment, not an endorsement.
I think this is why they don't want us going to college when we get out of school, because you learn some serious critical thinking skills. And, if you are a technical major, you also learn how to search for information. :)