Peacedog
My name is debator if you want me to contunue replying to you please use it! I have done the curtesy of using your forum name and find it weird that people on here need to lump previous posters (in favour of witnesses) together as if they are all one person. I've seen them do it to someone called alice whom I think they have also accused of being me.
Your opinion of what you think witnesses mean by "God's channel" is only proof of your opinion. We have never claimed to be inspired so I cannot see your bases for this. By using God's word the Bible we are communicating with Jehovah and he with us! especially if he allows us to see such bible truths that anyone can test us by. If we are the only people atm that are doing what the Bible actually says then we are literally the only people communicating with Jehovah. Jews claimed to be God's only people that he communicated with, early Christians also claimed it. There is no wrongdoing in having confidence in your faith?
It's as simple as that. No hidden agenda, no terrible secret. Sometimes I think I've fallen into a Dan Brown novel on this site were people are trying to find the most sinister and complicated intentions in the most innocuous things.
At this time of fractured Christendom, The truth simply cannot be in all of them! there can be only one truth! IMO it is all with the witnessses who have humbly searched for it in God's word not traditional opinions of men that are not found in the bible.
Carvins words on a specific prophecy is just another strawman. Prophecy is a subjective part of the Bible that we are supposed to look outside of the bible for fulfilment of it and so is in a continual state of flux until well-established and even then it may need refinement as understanding become clearer. And since prophecy is only 100% after fulfilment, I am happy to run with whatever their current understanding of that prophetic scripture is. Care to offer an alternative explanation for that prophecy from your religion?
Hi isaac
It is a testable assertion! All Christian religions say their teachings are from the Bible but proof comes from testing them with the Bible. I did personally and found witnesses to have the most accurate bible understanding. You disagree with me and that is your perogative.
1 John 4:1
Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God,
Isaac the Early Christians themselves believed only they could explain and understand the bible. Were they arrogant too? They felt only they had been blessed to have revealed understanding of God's word.
Matthew 13:10-11 (New International Version)
10 The disciples came to him and asked, "Why do you speak to the people in parables?"
11 He replied, "The knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them.
This is not a wrongdoing Isaac.
The eunuch never saw philip again thats all it is saying. Was philip the only christian at that time? We have the established Bible record that congregations where unified by the letters thats wrere swapped and copied between them and they sent out men etc they gathered together for encouragement with overseers and apostles shepherding them. To teach and preach. that an established fact on how the Christian congregation functioned.
2 Thessalonians 2:15
So then, brothers, stand firm and hold to the teachings we passed on to you, whether by word of mouth or by letter.
Does it come any more plain speaking than that?
How can they hold to teachings yet believe something different? your just creating an oxymoron.
Isaac I use your name, please have the curtesy to use my name debator!