I didn't realise forum debates where judged as a spelling context and the best argument is measured by how well spelt they are.
I am not debating science. I support it as something that it measurable by the world around us but it isn't proof of the theory of Evolution or whatever is the current Darwinistic Mythology.
Biogeography is not proof of evoluion it actually works against it for the similar reasons you use it against the Bible. That we can clearly have stand alone species that have no obvious fossil connections with other species.
Witnesses are not a "New earth" Christian group and we do not expect science facts from the Bible which is not meant to be a scientific manual. It uses only simple but basic understandings of things the People around then could understand.
The reason why we don't debate Biogeography, is that it is not touched on by the Bible. We know angels travelled around the earth doings jobs for Jehovah from Daniel. We know a number of animal types were rescued by Noah, to speculate beyond this is just to play into your hands.
Disproving the Bible is not proving Darwinism.
You want us to speculate beyond the bible to trap us.
Science IMO will end up disproving darwinism itself by simply showing that it just isn't feasable. but until then You have your faith in the theories that scientist churn out under the heading of Evolution and we have our faith in God.