sensible, safe sex, in my opinion, should be engaged in.
because, as you get older and are ready to settle down, you will look at your potential sole mate, not for sexual reasons, but for what they have to offer mentally and if they are compatible.
when religion restricts this, and yuo must marry to have sex, i believe that you doom a marriage at the outset, because these young folks marry out of lust, only to have the rose colored blinders pulled off later, and regret the entire arrangement... .
i got married at 20--after a very frustrating 3 year courtship to a born in. Both of us were virgins till thye wedding night. the marriage somehow survived 13 years & produced 3 kids.
i wonder how many--in a similar situation to mine--( back then )-----are curious about sex with someone else?
hy guys the other day my wife had a discussion with her jws brother and he told her that he received all posted material from this site posted by myself and was disgusted with the information.
now that's all fine by me but what i am pissed about is that some one in here from sydney australia is a mole and pretends to be an ex jws while all the while exposing each and every one he knows as in my case.
you are one big coward and one who hides behind a skirt a yellow and a chicken shit whom doesn't have the balls to face me in person because you obviously know who i am.
i would just love to think my jw family were reading this site.
from the secret elders' book which states that the list "of course" is "not comprehensive".
nevertheless here are the acts that they deem worthy of specifying as being possible grounds for chucking people out:.
murdermanslaughter such as killing someone while breaking traffic lawsattempting suicidesexual intercourse with someone other than your spouseanal sex with someone other than your spouseoral sex with someone other than your spousesexual stimulation of the genitals of someone other than your spousedelay in reporting a rape?
so--is it Ok to masturbate in the kingdom hall toilet then?
just wanna know.
i'm doing the fade but i reckon my big mouth could get me dfd.
i know plenty who've been dfd for fornication/adultery, but never met one dfd for speaking the truth.
i was never DF'd. regrettably.
i had DA'd in the early 70's--and lived a normal life with my born-in wife and our kids.
a few years later i had an affair with a sister in the local cong--she was DF'd for that----but it was announced ( i was told ) at the time --i couldnt be DF'd as i wasnt a j-dub---but they called me an apostate---which i think was worse than merely being DF.
that was in 1981. ive had nothing to do with the cult ever since. lucky me.
remember the guys that started the shit storm with the deaf sign language video?
the multiple funny versions at youtube?.
this time they are mocking the tract (the guy that started this isn't even a ex-jw, but they are pretty good at taking down cults!).
brilliant---
-i put a link on the UK ex j facebook site
[if !mso]> <style> v\:* {behavior:url(#default#vml);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#vml);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#vml);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#vml);} </style> <![endif].
[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:worddocument> <w:view>normal</w:view> <w:zoom>0</w:zoom> <w:compatibility> <w:breakwrappedtables /> <w:snaptogridincell /> <w:wraptextwithpunct /> <w:useasianbreakrules /> </w:compatibility> <w:browserlevel>microsoftinternetexplorer4</w:browserlevel> </w:worddocument> </xml><!
[endif][if !mso]> <object classid="clsid:38481807-ca0e-42d2-bf39-b33af135cc4d" id=ieooui> </object> <style> st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } </style> <!
i was a heavy smoker for years--till i had a heart attack aged 49--so i cant recommend it--for health reasons.
but i guess you need to try it for yourself---like sex i suppose. either will probably make you throw up the first time you try it.
"questionable taste" ??
http://jwsurvey.org/governing-body-2/new-light-watchtower-magazine-leaked-from-organization-weeks-ahead-of-general-release.
if doctrinal explanations are missing from the article, it is because they are also missing from the magazine.. i would like to give my thanks again to my source for supplying me with the magazine article weeks ahead of its scheduled release.
it showed remarkable courage, because risks were taken.
lots of hard work there Cedars ( applause )
so--have i got this right--the "great tribulation" starts when the UN turns on " false religion"----a future event---may be soon---or may be very much later.
is this a way of handing over the game plan to the UN---and lets the watchtower off the hook over this prophecy?
also--the UN member nations are made up of lots of "false religion"------so--does this mean the UN turns on itself?
i cant help thinking the watchtower has written itself a nice cop out clause here------"the end" begins when a future event never happens.
