By the way, just a disclaimer. My last post was sarcasm.
I have to agree with the first poster. They should be more dignified when speaking out about their political views. I get so mad when I see and hear celebrities speaking out on different politics. Most of them do not have a clue what they are talking about.
On the other side of the coin, I get angry at celebrities who are pro-war and express that opinion, when they have no clue what they're talking about. Sometimes the only thing they seem to be demonstrating is that they will be patriotic to whatever the government is doing, whether it's right or wrong, they will follow happily. (Hmmm... sorta like being loyal to the WTBTS, right or wrong?) Unfortunately, it usually comes down to an issue of patriotism, not issues. "You are wither with us or against us".
Unfortunately for me, I've seen where the administration has stretched the truth and has been deceitful. If they do have any credible evidence for their claims that have not been debunked, I have not seen that. There are weapons inspectors on-site looking for weapons and not finding any of the WOMD they are purported to have. The way justice works in America, if somebody had reason to believe you had something illegal, a search warrant would be issued (UN weapons inspectors). If they didn't find anything, you wouldn't be hauled off to jail and punished. And before they found anything, it would be called a lynch mob if you were hauled off and punished - vigilante justice. Maybe they punished the right guy, but wouldn't you want to wait for proof? Yet this administration is asking us to jump the gun. They KNOW that WOMD exist, so we must go to war, mostly based on heresay and photos that could be interpreted many ways. I think that Bush's policy is fair game to criticize. Besides, this whole thing is the UN's ballgame. They imposed the sanctions, it's up to them to enforce them and decide whether they were violated and how to punish violations. We are getting awfully jumpy about enforcing somebody else's sanctions.
Maybe I'm wrong. I'd rather let things play out diplomatically and let the inspectors keep searching. When and if they do find something, then a course of action can be decided on. That may involve force, but I'd be more OK with it once they find evidence on-site. In much the same way I'd want evidence to convict a criminal, not heresay and falsified "evidence".
And let's face it, for the most part, nobody really cared about Iraq until the propaganda started in. So a lot of this feeling among many is because the government got them to feel that way through propaganda. That can be scary. In much the same way, Hitler whipped up national fervor against the Jews and other enemies of his.
That's why I'm opposed to our president's course. I've been reading about it and I've formed my opinions based on research. Maybe it's wrong or faulty, but I've looked into it at least. I'm not just following or bashing somebody based on patriotism. It's based on the issues at hand.