Over 1.8 million followers received the sparlock video link thanks to Penn Jillette's tweet :)
Don't you just love the internet?
3M
.
.
how well do you think about we can get the word out about the watchtower's embarrassing pr disaster before witnesses attend their conventions?.
lawyer tells of agonising scenes as doctors forced to let a jehovah's witness who wanted to live, die.. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/lawyer-tells-of-agonising-scenes-as-doctors-forced-to-let-a-jehovahs-witness-who-wanted-to-live-die-7879674.html.
a lawyer who advised doctors that they must let a 22-year-old jehovah's witness die even though he wanted to live has spoken of the agonising scenes before the young man's death.. robert tobin, a partner in the london law firm kennedys, was called in by an unnamed nhs trust when the man, a jehovahs witness who was critically ill with sickle cell anaemia, refused a blood transfusion which could have saved his life.. over three weeks the man gradually deteriorated as the crisis progressed, before eventually dying.
medical staff were understandably upset at seeing a patient deteriorate before their eyes knowing a simple procedure could have been provided that would have saved his life, mr tobin said.. the mans mother, also a jehovahs witness, was at her sons bedside, and an elder from the mans church also attended.
In this case, it looks like the WT got just what they wanted. They confuse and guilt-trip the average JW into going FAR BEYOND the WT's latest policies, even those written in their mags, because they can't keep up with it, and are so afraid they will die for all eternity they don't want to take ANY chances of slipping up. They WOULD NOT have DF'ed this young man - it was HIS DECISION... boosted by fear-induction from the elders who stop short of promising DFing. This happens all the time. The history of the Society tells many of these stories where JWs go BEYOND current WT written policy due to the effectiveness of the brainwashing! They make it appear that the decision is really the victim's - because it is! But nothing would have happened to the voung man if he took blood. The congo would not have DFed him.
Now he is DEAD.
The WT can wash their hands of any "wrongdoing," as it was his decision.
WOW! This makes a lot of sence.
3M
lawyer tells of agonising scenes as doctors forced to let a jehovah's witness who wanted to live, die.. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/lawyer-tells-of-agonising-scenes-as-doctors-forced-to-let-a-jehovahs-witness-who-wanted-to-live-die-7879674.html.
a lawyer who advised doctors that they must let a 22-year-old jehovah's witness die even though he wanted to live has spoken of the agonising scenes before the young man's death.. robert tobin, a partner in the london law firm kennedys, was called in by an unnamed nhs trust when the man, a jehovahs witness who was critically ill with sickle cell anaemia, refused a blood transfusion which could have saved his life.. over three weeks the man gradually deteriorated as the crisis progressed, before eventually dying.
medical staff were understandably upset at seeing a patient deteriorate before their eyes knowing a simple procedure could have been provided that would have saved his life, mr tobin said.. the mans mother, also a jehovahs witness, was at her sons bedside, and an elder from the mans church also attended.
Lawyer tells of agonising scenes as doctors forced to let a Jehovah's Witness who wanted to live, die.
A lawyer who advised doctors that they must let a 22-year-old Jehovah's Witness die even though he wanted to live has spoken of the agonising scenes before the young man's death.
Robert Tobin, a partner in the London law firm Kennedy’s, was called in by an unnamed NHS Trust when the man, a Jehovah’s Witness who was critically ill with sickle cell anaemia, refused a blood transfusion which could have saved his life.
Over three weeks the man gradually deteriorated as the crisis progressed, before eventually dying.
“Medical staff were understandably upset at seeing a patient deteriorate before their eyes knowing a simple procedure could have been provided that would have saved his life,” Mr Tobin said.
The man’s mother, also a Jehovah’s Witness, was at her son’s bedside, and an elder from the man’s church also attended. The trust was concerned that they were unduly influencing him but a doctor from a neighbouring trust who was called in to assess him said he had full capacity and was making the decision on his own.
Mr Tobin said: “I don’t know what his mother was thinking as she sat by and watched him die. I assume either she felt powerless or she felt bound to her own religious code of conduct which says you can’t share blood with others.
“He had full capacity, he made his decision, however irrational. His doctors were bound by that. The rules are very clear.”
Mr Tobin said that at the Trust’s request, the Jehovah’s Witness signed an advance directive - the so-called “living Will” - setting out his wishes in case he lost mental capacity in the future.
Mr Tobin highlighted the ethical discrepancy in the law which forbids the same doctors from assisting those who want to die.
He contrasted the Jehovah's Witness's case with those cases raised in the debate over assisted dying, in which patients have petitioned the courts for the right to seek help to end their lives.
Last week Tony Nicklinson who has “locked in” syndrome after suffering a massive stroke, sought a ruling exempting doctors from criminal prosecution if they assisted his suicide.
“There is a subtle distinciton between a patient’s right to life and a patient’s right to die,” Mr Tobin said.
While the law forced medical staff to stand aside and not intervene in the case of the 22 year old Jehovah’s Witness, even though the man had no intention of ending his life, they were prevented from intervening to help patients such as Tony Nicklinson die at a time of their choosing.
“But the same doctors could be faced on a another day with a patient who wants assistance to die when his condition becomes impossible to live with. In that case the doctors could face criminal prosecution if they helped him to realise his wish,” said Mr Tobin.
While the legal distinction was clear for doctors treating the Jehovah's Witness, the ethical one was not. Both patients wanted to exercise their personal autonomy but only one - the Jehovah’s Witness - was able to do so, because he needed no assistance.
Mr Tobin added: “It is tragic that his goal was not to die but to ensure that he obeyed what he regarded as his religious commands. Death only came about as a consequence of that and not, as with those wishing assistance with dying, as the primary aim."
_________________________
More Blood on The Wacthowers Hands!
3M
i was on a date tonight, eating in a cuban restaurant owned by jws (they have never met me, incidentally, the food was really good) when i realized that there was not just one, but two conventions in town.
one was the standard english speaking district convention folks, the other was the asl folks using the assembly hall in town for their district convention.. my date, who knows all about my jw past, tries to strike up a conversation with some of them sitting at the bar, asks them what they are in town for, etc.
they just said "for a convention".
This reminds me when I was flying from Melbourne to Sydney for the international convention in 2003 (Give God Glory).
I was on the same flight with a lot of other JWs, I mean a lot of JWs about 1/3 of the plane. They were all wearing their 'Give God Glory' nametags (nerds).
I wouldn't be seen dead wearing that on the plane so I was 'tagless'.
I sat down next to a 'worldly' woman and she said to me jokingly: "I feel safe because God won't let anything happen to this flight as there are all these 'God' people on the plane...hahaha"
I just replied: "Yeah, we must be pretty safe" and never spoke about them or the international dorky cult convention we were all flying to.
So EntirelyPossible just like your title says: JWs wouldn't preach despite multiple opportunities... I was a JW that would NOT preach if I was not going D2D. Good to hear from your post that others avoid preaching even while wearing their nametags!
a badge I am now proud I wore ! "Phizzy, Crap JW"
Me too Phizzy! [3Mozzies, A Crap JW] I feel so proud now
3M
30 minutes ago i just got off the phone with some important players in this case, and some things were relayed to me concerning a lot of details of the outcome of the last two days of court.
i am passing this on.
cynthia hampton, one of the main players in the candace conti case (and a close friend of 28 years), just informed me of a further, far more powerful move by the state of california against the watch tower bible and tract society of new york, inc.. by order of the superior court of the state of california - county of alameda (see documents below), until the watch tower's appeal, which won't begin until august 13th and will take up to two years to settle due to due process of law, has forbidden the watch tower to sell any more of its $1 billion in assets in the borough of brooklyn until the appeals case is finished, to assure they won't shelter their monies in the light of this most huge and devastating sexual abuse scandal ever to hit the watch tower society, and perhaps any other single-victim lawsuit.
I am sooooooooooooooo happy!!!!!!!!!!
Awesome video! . . . thanks for sharing sizemik
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bb-gem8ehk&feature=plcp.
also here on vimeo: http://vimeo.com/44370032.
aired on australian tv june 2nd 2012.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bb-geM8ehk&feature=plcp
Also here on Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/44370032
Aired on Australian TV June 2nd 2012
______________________________
*Girls parents refused transfusion on religious grounds
*Girl diagnosed with cancer of blood and bone marrow
*Without treatment girl will die..."within weeks"
______________________________________________________________
DOCTORS made an urgent plea to the Supreme Court yesterday to help save the life of a Jehovah's Witness girl dying of leukaemia.
Justice Richard White ordered the girl, 4, receive treatment, including a blood transfusion to which her parents had objected on religious grounds.
Paediatric oncologist Dr Petra Ritchie, right, said without treatment the girl "will die . . . I would say in weeks".
Dr Ritchie said that the girl, who was diagnosed with cancer of the blood and bone marrow on Monday, had a 90 per cent chance of survival if she received treatment immediately.
Doctors had this week advised she needed a potentially life-saving blood transfusion but her parents objected on religious grounds.
The parents' opposition prompted the hospital to petition the court saying that, without treatment, the girl would die in a matter of weeks.
In emotional scenes yesterday, the girls' father wept as he spoke of his love for his daughter.
But he explained that his family's faith prohibited blood transfusions. "We adhere to strict Bible principles and one of those is to abstain from blood," he said.
"We want the best possible treatment for (her) and the hospital are doing a great job. The only thing we don't consent to is the issue of blood."
The hearing came almost two years after the court made a legal-first ruling to save a boy, 10.
Yesterday Justice White - who also heard the boy's case - said that treatment was in the girl's best interests.
"Without a blood transfusion, there is a very high prospect that (she) will die," he said.
The father told the court that his daughter's illness became known to them about six weeks ago when she reported a sore leg and recorded a temperature.
However, doctors told the family it was a virus and it was not until they took her to hospital on Monday that a diagnosis of leukaemia was formed.
She said the girl was at risk of organ damage to her heart, brain and kidney. Even if the girl survived the leukaemia without a blood transfusion, Dr Ritchie said she could suffer learning difficulties and subtle cognitive and kidney damage.
Todd Golding, for the Woman's and Children's Health Network Inc, said Justice White should interpret the law the way he did in the 2010 case.
"The court is to act in what are the best interests of the child.
"The situation factually, as is clear from the evidence, (the girl) has leukaemia from which she will almost certainly die.
"It is in the submission of the plaintiff that she receive a blood transfusion as soon as possible," he said.
Ken Gluche, for the girl's parents, said his clients "deeply love their child".
"It's not like they are acting with callous disregard for her wellbeing or her future," he said.
"Clearly it's their genuine beliefs, it's something that they've been convinced to accept by anyone else, by the church or other believers."
Robert Croser, for the child, said he had not formally interviewed his client because of her inability to appropriately instruct him. "Nobody on either side of the case wants (the girl) to die," he said.
"Neither (the father) nor his wife and the wider Jehovah's Witness church would treat (the girl) any differently if the court orders she have the blood transfusion."
Justice White handed down his decision immediately.
"I'm satisfied that this is a matter that should be determined urgently because (the girl) suffers from leukaemia and that requires urgent treatment," he said. "I'm satisfied that it is appropriate and indeed necessary for (the girl) to receive a blood transfusion.
"I'm satisfied that there are no alternatives to the provision of a blood transfusion. I'm satisfied that it's in (the girl's) best interest to received the blood transfusion despite her parents' objections.
"Without a blood transfusion there's a very high prospect (the girl) will die and that the provision of a blood transfusion would reduce that prospect markedly," he said.
************************************************************
heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/judge-forces-jehovahs-witness-parents-to-allow-transfusions-for-daughter-with-cancer/story-e6frf7l6-1226380955006?sv=1f59ea9b9d31254af49c7ef33b543fdd
Listen to the comment from the local elder & JW friend quoted at 1min 12sec. What morons!
3Mozzies
9pm i was sitting in my recliner when i literally felt my ass vibrating....as there was no other reason for this i turned to my wife on the couch and said: "did you feel that...i think it was a tremor..." "yeah i did feel something.".
i guess this is a huge sign that the the end is near or......we live on a planet that has shifting plates and australia is slowly moving north.
jesus said earthquakes, pestilence and wars would increase, but isn't that like saying "the weather will be hot....and freezing cold....then it will get very hot again...." very obvious "signs" from a carpenter in the first century.. alot of witnesses will be going out in field service this morning..
(M'ICE = Mozzie on Ice - aka meth)
Hey! I'm not on meth. . .
9PM I was sitting in my recliner when I literally felt my ass vibrating....
I felt my ass vibrating too last night (in Melb) but I thought I let one rip without knowing
3Mozzies
i've uploaded a video that discusses the dramatic jury verdict regarding the abuse suffered by candace conti, of which you are all aware.
if you're not yet familiar with the story for any reason, please check out my blog article on the link below.... http://jwsurvey.org/general-information/the-watchtower-punished-society-loses-legal-battle-over-child-abuse-case.
john hoyle suggested i get a youtube video out fairly quickly so that we can spread the message more effectively online.
Excellent video Cedars!
I hope you don't mind but I have uploaded it to Vimeo as well. (Kept your info 'as is' in the description & credited you & your website)
http://vimeo.com/ mozzies / watchtower
Well done mate :)
3M