Not that it changes anything but this thread was resurrected from Dec 28, 2001
Just an FYI
i was at bethel with my now ex-husband in early 1982. at that time, they did a tb test as part of the physical when you started.
mine came out positive for exposure (though i did not and have never had tb), probably because i had worked as a receptionist in a hospital x-ray department.. the weird bit is that the bethel doctor insisted on giving me a gynacological exam.
as i was only 22 at the time, and butt-stupid, i went ahead and let him.
Not that it changes anything but this thread was resurrected from Dec 28, 2001
Just an FYI
here ya go hon!!!!.
you'll note that my packers turtleneck underneath this purple shirt protected me from any evil demons!!.
i just wish that my packer attire would have helped my team last nite- .
Dallas WHO??? Didn't they have a team back in the 70's???
smirking evilly
Kismet
here ya go hon!!!!.
you'll note that my packers turtleneck underneath this purple shirt protected me from any evil demons!!.
i just wish that my packer attire would have helped my team last nite- .
I realize how much that must have pained you to do this.
You are a class act.
I am sorry about the Pack, but it just couldn't last forever. I did end up following the advice of a very sage woman and took Atlanta to cover the spread.
Looking forward to future bets!
Kismet
i discovered a major security flaw on the silentlambs website, i e-mailed bill about it, setup up a small demonstration, mind you i told no one else about this.
and the demonstration was benine, because this flaw could allow someone to forward the site to say porn sights.
i won't go into detail, but let's just say i could cause alot of havoc with it.
Let me see if I understand:
I e-mailed bill about it, setup up a small demonstration, mind you I told no one else about this. And the demonstration was benine
the demonstration was simply a pop up alert window, that said bill contact me, this needs to be fixed, paraphrasing, after I e-mailed him.
So you did hack albeit in a benign way into the site and altered things sufficiently to create a pop-up note to Bill. Hacking is hacking and most webmasters and ISP/ASP owners I know would ban your butt as well. I guess I am left wondering was a demonstration really necessary?
You hacked the site, altered the code and expect accolades for it? I just don't get you sometimes.
You claim to be a survivor of abuse or at least a sibling of a survivor, yet you verbally abuse others online and often threaten physical violence (abuse) against people you don't like. Not to mention your quick (slanderous) labelling of others as supporters of pedophiles (i.e. Amazing). Now you hack into someone's site and act like a wounded puppy when they ban you (if in fact this is the case).
I would really suggest working on thicker skin not to mention a little forethought into your actions. You've done some great work for Lambs but your online manner/behavior really doesn't encourage others to seek your help for such a sensitive cause.
Just my opinion.
Kismet -who is just going to kick his own ass before Trauma threatens to do it :)
wedding vows .
til death do us part
(note: although i speak about women here this can easily be reversed) .
Thank you.
I was, in my own awkward way, trying to explain this very point to someone who has left an abusive marriage.
Thank you for explaining it so well.
You are a gem!!
Kismet
i heard that two post office workers there are infected with it.
they handled a letter addressed to the minister of weapons (i think thats his title) has anybody heard this??
hope it's not true.
Canada is currently in the midst of a gun registry fiasco. This seems to be the basis for the hoax.
A Post Office in Edmonton Alberta (Western Canada) was cleared of about 150 employees, but it was just a precaution. Last I heard no trace of Anthrax had been found and everyone was sent home.
Just got a link to a story regarding the incident:
. http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2003/01/03/8805-cp.html
Kismet
i don't know if this information has already been posted or not, so i'll go ahead and post it here.. on january 1st 2003, bill bowen sent the following information to everyone on his e-mail list:.
press release -- distribute freely.
tuesday, january 1. contact:.
Hillary:
As I addressed in my first comment, the SL.org vehicle has been poorly identified as being of support to victims of abuse rather than it actually being an activist organization intent on changing policy through the media and the courts and public pressure.
Many survivors of abuse have already been sideswiped by that vehicle. Feeling like they are little more than trading cards, almost stating 'ohhh incest with rape will get me further in the public eye than just a rape. You are now my new poster child'
Whether Bill is the right driver of the 'activist' vehicle or if he should just be a figurehead (the elder who quit in protest role) is hopefully being determined.
But at the same time slamming him personally in a public venue accomplishes little. (I am not saying you have done this Hillary)
So I repeat, "I do agree with you regarding the need for de-personalizing silentlambs.org and getting trained people to do the work"
I hope Bill is listening.
Kismet
PS - Englishman, thanks for the clarification
i don't know if this information has already been posted or not, so i'll go ahead and post it here.. on january 1st 2003, bill bowen sent the following information to everyone on his e-mail list:.
press release -- distribute freely.
tuesday, january 1. contact:.
I completely understand Rev's frustration and comments.
I fail to understand Englishman's. Why the personal insult? What does a personal attack accomplish?
Kismet
Editted to add:
Hilary: I thought THE most important issue was the survivors of abuse. But I do agree with you regarding the need for de-personalizing silentlambs.org and getting trained people to do the work.
Edited by - Kismet on 2 January 2003 20:32:55
i don't know if this information has already been posted or not, so i'll go ahead and post it here.. on january 1st 2003, bill bowen sent the following information to everyone on his e-mail list:.
press release -- distribute freely.
tuesday, january 1. contact:.
Interjecting a moment here...
First, Bill has a laudable objective, that of changing Society policy. His methods are bullish (as in china shop). He has taken the most expedient path and has primarily focussed on those Lambs who will roar and can advance his media and legal objectives. Those lambs that must remain silent or who just cannot roar at this time are pushed aside. This same bullish path has led him to make some regrettable statements that have hurt the Silent Lambs cause but most importantly has hurt individual lambs as a result.
Does this make him evil? No. He is a simple man from Kentucky, not a Wall Street spin-doctor. He has done remarkably well despite his lack of training as an activist. But he needs to be made aware that he has hurt some lambs in the process. That knowledge will hopefully cause him to think before making further poorly worded or ill-prepared press releases.
To pick him apart also falls into the category of poor judgement or poorly thought out speech. Very little is accomplished by ripping apart the man. Correcting him or pointing out errors however is important, It is the constant nattering at such errors is inappropriate IMO.
That said, I think Bill did err in both his press release and newsletter. Please view this as it is intended as constructive advice not as trying to attack Bill.
The information Bill mentioned in his newsletter regarding the Canadian show was not to be released at this point in time.
The 'Dateline fiasco' was not limited to JWD and one would have thought Bill would have learned from that lesson. The producers have asked all involved that not even the name of the show be publicized at this point or at least until a firm airdate has been made. I am very disappointed that the producers requests were ignored, not exactly conducive to future relations.
Bill is doing some good work, but it should be clear to survivors of abuse that unless they are willing to speak up and be heard, they do not fall into Bills primary agenda.
It is my NSH opinion, that survivors do not need to feel added pressure for them to speak up, but that such roaring should only be done when the survivor is ready and if it is conducive to their own well being. Survivors of abuse usually have to cope with enough wrongly placed feelings of guilt without guilt-trips being put on them for not speaking up.
Those lambs who are just finding their voice or who cannot speak up or chose not to, are better to find outside sources of support such as are available through RAINN and not through a group whos primary goal is trying to change a Cult/religion/sects policies. (See info on RAINN below)
I wish Bill all success in his objective to change the policy of the Borg. I hope it works, I really do. It may just protect potential future victims if he succeeds and the publicity being made thusfar has warned not just a few people of the potential danger within the 'spiritual paradise'. For that a deserved well done to Bill is in order.
RAPE, ABUSE, & INCEST NATIONAL NETWORK
1-800-HOPE RAINN operates the nation's only toll-free hotline for survivors of sexual assault. The hotline is operated 24 hours a day, and routes each call instantaneously to the rape crisis center nearest the caller by reading the area code and prefix of the caller's telephone number. All centers on the network provide counselling and support, and each call is confidential. RAINN's office is located at 252 Tenth Street, NE, Washington, DC 20002. Business Phone: (202) 544-1034. FAX: (202) 544-1401 Other numbers of interest: NATIONAL VICTIM CENTER703-276-2880 NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER202-328-5160 WOMEN'S BUREAU1-800-827-5335
Many of the state agencies have counselling services, provide legal referrals and advocacy, operate community education programs and offer support groups. For more information, contact RAINN's office or their national hotline.
i never thought that they could be this dumb.
i called an elder in the cong.
where my daughter's abuser lives.
You didn't mention the age of your daughter but if she is able than she should report this to the authorities.
Talk with her yourself, and determine what is best for her. If she is too young to make that determination, get her help and you report it yourself. When doing so, you might want to mention to the child welfare folks that the clergy of such and such congregation have known about this for over a month and you only found out yourself.
Regardless if it is reported or not, whether or not the Society catches crap for this or not, please get your daughter whatever help she needs.
Her health and mental well-being is far more important than 'getting' the Society. That can always be done later.
I wish you and your daughter well.
Kismet