Don’t kid yourself.
It’s no Golden Parachute.
More of an exile, actually.
And from what some alleged sources have claimed, he was merely trying to slow down the reforms, rather than stop ‘em altogether.
it’s been a long time since i’ve kept up with anything jw-related.
but just a couple days ago, i heard about all the new changes—beards, shunning, etc.
i was surprised, so i asked an old friend who i hadn’t spoken to in ages what happened.
Don’t kid yourself.
It’s no Golden Parachute.
More of an exile, actually.
And from what some alleged sources have claimed, he was merely trying to slow down the reforms, rather than stop ‘em altogether.
i am thinking that the "ten year plan" that some have spoken of is the most likely scenario.
the org.
has to both attract new members and retain as many existing ones as possible.. so i think they will let the recent changes "bed in" for a while, maybe a year ?
Depends on how panicked they are.
the parliament of the world's religions, member of the united religions initiative, has on their website a focus24 page, they call this year the year of democracy.. apparently an unusually large proportion of the world's countries are holding national elections this year, it's certainly the case here in ireland.
this somehow is the focus of their mission, it reads well, you know peace, love and justice etc.
i am wondering if the the watchtower society is a part of this movement, seeing as they have the 501c3 agreement they are also a state church, therefore bound to follow the states laws and regulations for fear of fines or loss of the 501c3 religious charity status, loss of tax exemption etc.. if so, we could be seeing many more changes this year.. does anyone have more detailed info on what rules and regulations 501c3 religious charities have to comply with?
Funny thing…
…the WTS always portrayed “Satan’s World” cracking down on “False Religion” and “God’s People” with militant and violent force during the “Last Days”.
Being sued, taxed, and legislated into oblivion never seemed to occur to them.
😏
this was posted on jw leaks.. my truth's | dad seeking truth.
.
.
NotFormer - “Identifying paradoxes within their approaches seems never to have been their strong point…”
Why would it be?
They know it’s wrong, but believe it’s True, at the same time.
Just about any paradoxical stance or outcome is possible once you’ve reached that point. 😵💫
let's be honest, there's a stigma to the name jehovah's witness.
if they are going more mainstream.
i imagine the first recommendation was a name change.
“CWJ”…
…“Christian Witnesses of Jehovah”.
this was posted on jw leaks.. my truth's | dad seeking truth.
.
.
Ironic that the WT leadership got so scared of “apostasy” that over the decades, they dialed disfellowshipping up to eleven across the entire spectrum of, thus driving folks to apostasy who would otherwise have never even remotely considered it.
let's be honest, there's a stigma to the name jehovah's witness.
if they are going more mainstream.
i imagine the first recommendation was a name change.
I like to imagine Rutherford in Hell, being forced to watch a live feed in real-time of his entire legacy all going to shit.
😏
in a span of a few months time, we have had many unexpected changes announced by the jw organization.
some here have expressed the belief that a great number of witnesses will leave the religion.
in fact, there is a great probability the opposite will be true.. yeah, ancient hardliners will have a hard time assimilating these changes, but the younger generation will likely welcome these changes.
One thing that is satisfying about easing up on the dress code…
…the judgmental Karens at the Hall will have considerably less to work with.
😏
in a span of a few months time, we have had many unexpected changes announced by the jw organization.
some here have expressed the belief that a great number of witnesses will leave the religion.
in fact, there is a great probability the opposite will be true.. yeah, ancient hardliners will have a hard time assimilating these changes, but the younger generation will likely welcome these changes.
One old standby in particular that the Org used for for years was the expression “we do not recommend/advise you to…” (paraphrasing, but not much).
…which was overwhelmingly understood by the R&F as “we recommend/advise you not to”…
…whereas technically (in terms of grammar), it was actually a much more neutral turn of phrase, closer to “we neither recommend nor forbid you to…”
It took me years to figure that out.
in a span of a few months time, we have had many unexpected changes announced by the jw organization.
some here have expressed the belief that a great number of witnesses will leave the religion.
in fact, there is a great probability the opposite will be true.. yeah, ancient hardliners will have a hard time assimilating these changes, but the younger generation will likely welcome these changes.
NotFormer - “…R&F JWs are probably trying to find the hidden code: ‘What are they actually commanding us to do here?’…”
Tell them “nothing”, sit back, and watch the confusion. 😏
I’m actually reminded of when they started discussing blood fractions; specifically advising to inform your doctor of your choices …and a lot of folks did indeed try to “decode” the instructions.
One old loyalist biddy said that she still wouldn’t accept anything, only to be told “don’t tell us, tell your doctor”.
Viewing almost everything as some kind of litmus test and feeling compelled to broadcast all your personal business to everyone around you must be exhausting AF. 😵💫