article.
https://saysorry.org/2024/02/19/jehovahs-witnesses-and-the-australian-national-redress-scheme/.
video.
re. DNcall‘s post…
That actually rings a bell.
It’s been a while since I read Barb Anderson’s story, but I do seem to recall her mentioning that Jaracz was a primary opponent.
Don’t recall her ever suggesting that Jaracz was an offender, though…
…the first time I ever heard that allegation was when I read this:
https://jwsurvey.org/news/governing-body-of-jehovahs-witnesses-named-as-defendants-in-child-abuse-lawsuits
article.
https://saysorry.org/2024/02/19/jehovahs-witnesses-and-the-australian-national-redress-scheme/.
video.
Did he have that level of clout?
https://youtu.be/zq6cnuulvsg?si=ie1rhvguvzjney30
TonusOH - “…And it took an exJW to turn over the evidence that the congregations had…”
That’s gotta feel weird AF for any still-in believers who, nonetheless, would still actually want sex crimes legitimately punished (and yes, those believers do exist).
not sure if this was posted yet but the second gb member has been spotted with more than a mustache, and the first one going for a full beard (at about 3 minutes into the video):.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcgwkgrkh0k&pp=ygujancgymvhcmrz.
Bet the majority of ‘em look stupid, too.
😏
article.
https://saysorry.org/2024/02/19/jehovahs-witnesses-and-the-australian-national-redress-scheme/.
video.
“…so basically, the fox was put in charge of the henhouse, but not permitted to scrub his own name, so he essentially weaponized the two-witness rule to keep his own alleged acts under wraps, resulting in the problem becoming widespread, institutionalized, and unfixable under the current system…”
I just remembered…
…there was a particular GB member that Jaracz had a long-standing grudge against. Maybe he’s the one who made sure Ted couldn’t delete his own name from the DB.
Anybody remember his name?
And didn’t another insider once hint that Jaracz had essentially sabotaged or doomed the Org (unwittingly or otherwise)?
I’d always wondered what that meant… maybe it was this.
https://youtu.be/zq6cnuulvsg?si=ie1rhvguvzjney30
Link, “Like”, and hashtag the shit out of it.
article.
https://saysorry.org/2024/02/19/jehovahs-witnesses-and-the-australian-national-redress-scheme/.
video.
ThomasMore - “…Ted was on the list…”
Was? Or is?
The list still exists.
ThomasMore - “Has WTC paid into the scheme for victims?”
As of now?
Not a cent.
not sure if this was posted yet but the second gb member has been spotted with more than a mustache, and the first one going for a full beard (at about 3 minutes into the video):.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcgwkgrkh0k&pp=ygujancgymvhcmrz.
Just assume all the news, good or bad, is fake, and you’re covered. 😁
“…All the excess deaths from clogged arteries is just made up lies by apostates to try to make Jehovah’s direction look bad…”
😂
https://pennrecord.com/stories/654791353-pa-courts-weigh-whether-jehovah-s-witnesses-elders-must-report-confessed-child-abuse.
harrisburg – after the commonwealth court of pennsylvania dismissed a petition from a group of jehovah’s witnesses nearly two years ago, which argued the confidentiality of their confessions shielded them from being mandatory reporters of child abuse, the supreme court of pennsylvania overruled their colleagues and decided the commonwealth court must re-examine the action.. in a 24-page memorandum opinion authored by state supreme court chief justice debra todd and handed down feb. 13, the court found that their commonwealth court contemporaries violated the coordinate jurisdiction rule – which states “judges of coordinate jurisdiction sitting in the same case should not overrule each other’s decisions” – by its initial pair of separate findings that ivy hill congregation of jehovah’s witnesses did not have proper standing against the commonwealth’s department of human services, and that a grant of declaratory relief would not terminate the legal controversy.. todd was joined in the opinion by supreme court of pennsylvania justices christine donohue, kevin m. dougherty, david n. wecht and sallie updyke mundy.
justices p. kevin brobson and daniel mccaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.. “appellant is a congregation of approximately 140 individuals in philadelphia, pennsylvania, who follow the tenets of the jehovah’s witnesses religion.
Did the WT lawyers try and suggest that the Org would have to deal with hundreds of “spurious” allegations if this was enforced?
